Tensions are rising both on and off the track in Formula 1, with the line between analysis and conspiracy becoming increasingly blurred amid speculation and online backlash. Following the Japanese Grand Prix, Alpine has been forced to respond to serious allegations about its conduct, as well as a renewed wave of fan abuse.
“Any speculation about sabotage or withholding the same car from Franco is completely unfounded,” was Alpine F1 Team’s firm response to growing rumours that it had deliberately disadvantaged Franco Colapinto compared to his teammate, Pierre Gasly, following the Japanese Grand Prix.
Alpine responds to ‘sabotage’ claims
These rumours gained traction online after Colapinto had a difficult weekend, and suggested that Alpine had created unequal conditions between its two drivers, an accusation that the team categorically denies.
“It is absolutely not in the team’s interest not to score points,” Alpine stressed. “Any hint of self-sabotage is not conducive to achieving our ultimate goal.”
Updated: F1 set for major rules U-turn as FIA admits 2026 mistake after crash fears
Why Upgrades Aren’t Always Equal
In its detailed statement, Alpine sought to explain why such theories can emerge, pointing to the realities of Formula 1 development.
“It may happen this year that upgrades are made available to one car first,” the team admitted. “However, the goal remains to make upgrades available to both cars whenever possible.”
Due to tight production timelines and the limited availability of new components, teams are sometimes forced to introduce parts on a single car initially.
“In some cases, we are only able to bring selected parts or upgrades to specific events,” Alpine explained. “However, this is never the intended or desired approach.”
The reasoning is simple: if an upgrade improves performance, every team wants both cars to benefit immediately.
MORE F1 NEWS – Liam Lawson could race this month, but there’s a major problem
Alpine on its drivers: ‘Equal Place in the Team’
Amid the speculation, Alpine was keen to shut down any suggestion of internal bias.
Colapinto has an ‘equal place in the team’ alongside Gasly, the statement confirmed, reinforcing the idea that no hierarchy influences development decisions.
The team also clarified that, aside from minor changes earlier in the year, including a gearbox-related swap in China that temporarily impacted performance, both drivers have used largely identical machinery throughout the season.
Max Verstappen Considering Paid 2027 Sabbatical Amid F1 Frustrations
Suzuka Crash Fuels the Narrative
The controversy intensified after Colapinto’s collision with Oliver Bearman at Suzuka. The Argentine driver braked heavily while harvesting energy, triggering a collision that left Bearman injured.
Although the Fédération Internationale de l’Automobile chose not to hold Colapinto responsible, the incident became a flashpoint for criticism, and, in some quarters, conspiracy theories.
The combination of the high-profile crash and the perceived performance differences fuelled the narrative that Alpine was not treating its drivers equally.
Team Condemns Online Abuse
Alongside the sabotage claims, Alpine addressed a more serious issue: the wave of online abuse directed at its drivers.
“We would like to reiterate our condemnation of the hatred and insults directed not only at one of our drivers, but also at our competitors and the entire Formula 1 family,” the team stated.
The message was clear: criticism is part of sport, but personal attacks and threats are unacceptable.
WATCH BEARMANS CRASH AT SUZUKA 2026
Echoes of the Ocon Controversy
Alpine’s statement also referenced the earlier backlash involving Esteban Ocon at the 2026 Chinese Grand Prix.
Following a collision with Colapinto, Ocon received abuse and even death threats, despite the Argentine driver admitting, “It’s my fault… I apologised,” and Ocon confirming, “Everything is fine.”
As this website reported on after the Chinese GP, the backlash prompted a strong response from Bullet Sports Management, the agency representing Colapinto, which issued a public plea to fans:
“Public service notice: please do not send hate messages or death threats to Esteban, his family, or the Haas F1 team.”
The statement continued: “This will not change the accident and only damages the image of Franco’s fans. Please continue to offer him positive and respectful support!”
The intervention from Colapinto’s own representatives underlined just how serious the situation had become.
By drawing that parallel, Alpine highlighted a worrying trend: routine racing incidents are increasingly triggering extreme reactions online.
MORE NEWS – Big update on Jack Doohan and his exit from F1 to a new career away from the paddock
A Growing Challenge for Formula 1
The twin issues of conspiracy theories and online toxicity point to a broader challenge for Formula 1 as the sport continues to grow in popularity around the world.
With more fans than ever before engaging with the sport, both accurate and unfounded narratives can spread rapidly. In Alpine’s case, a challenging race weekend escalated into accusations of sabotage and an increase in abusive behaviour.
The team’s priorities are clear: maintain transparency, support both drivers equally, and push back firmly against misinformation.
Would you like to see more TJ13 Formula 1 coverage? Add us to your favourites list on Google to receive trusted F1 news.
NEXT ARTICLE – Max Verstappen Considering Paid 2027 Sabbatical Amid F1 Frustrations
One thing was crystal clear at the recent 2026 Formula One Japanese Grand Prix, and that is Max Verstappen is a very unhappy man. In the FIA press conference he banished a journalist from The Guardian, refusing to answer questions until the offending pork pie hat had left the room.
Verstappen claims Giles Richards had ‘laughed in his face’ following the season finale in Abu Dhabi last season. Having fallen short by just 14 points of becoming only the second F1 driver to claim five consecutive titles, Richards reminded Max of his red mist in Spain where he appeared to ram the Mercedes of George Russell.
The resulting 10 second penalty issued by the race stewards probably cost Verstappen in the region of 9 points that day, so it was not a deciding incident for his season anyway. Red Bull team boss Laurent Mekies is reported to have had words with his star driver following corporate pressure from Austria over the image he was portraying of the Red Bull brand.
Max reprimanded for dismissing journalists
Thats in itself is a bizarre tale, given that Red Bull energy drinks brand, the extreme sports they have supported and the rebellious attitude of the Red Bull F1 team have always been associated with kicking over the traces. How times have changed since the death of Red Bull founder Didi Mateschitz. But we digress.
As if to make matters worse, Vertsappen had his worst racing weekend of the season. He was out qualified for the second time by new team mate Isack Hadjar and dumped out of the top ten shootout by rookie Arvid Lindblad in the Red Bull sister car. The RB22 car was “undriveable” repeated Max throughout the…CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE
With over 30 years of experience in Formula 1 as an insider journalist, I have built trusted connections across the paddock, from race engineers and mechanics to senior team figures. At The Judge 13, I and a handful of trusted colleagues share exclusive Formula 1 news, expert analysis and behind-the-scenes stories you will not find in mainstream motorsport media.
A senior writer at TJ13, C.J. Alderson serves as Senior Editor and newsroom coordinator, with a background in online sports reporting and motorsport magazine editing. Alderson’s professional training in media studies and experience managing content teams ensures TJ13 maintains consistency of voice and credibility. During race weekends, Alderson acts as desk lead, directing contributors and smoothing breaking stories for publication.
