Despite his devastating engine failure on Lap 30 of the 2026 Formula One Canadian Grand Prix, George Russell claimed he “loved” the battle with his teenage teammate and that the new F1 engines have created the best racing he has seen in a decade.
His boss, Toto Wolff was less certain, claiming the team may have to put the “handbrake on” if the closeness of the on-track battles between the Mercedes drivers continues.
With the British driver claiming pole position for both the Sprint and the Grand Prix, his love of the Gilles Villeneuve circuit appeared to be confirmed. Having bemoaned all weekend long that the Miami track was a “bogey” track, Russell looked to be back on form.
The Intra-Team Battle in Montreal
Yet the nip-and-tuck racing Antonelli delivered in just his second season of F1 racing was hardly the bounce-back that George had hoped for. Russell again had a slow getaway at lights out, with teammate Antonelli taking the lead when Lando Norris pitted to ditch his wet weather tyres. Yet by Lap 5 he regained the top spot in the race from the young Italian.
For a further 25 laps until Russell’s engine expired, the pair thrilled the crowd with their nip-and-tuck racing and continual changes of position for the lead of the race. “I loved it, I thought it was great,” Russell said in the media pen. “And I’ve not had a battle like this in years. I haven’t seen a battle like this probably since Lewis [Hamilton] and Nico [Rosberg] in Bahrain 2014.
“And these new cars allow you to do that. These new engines allow you to do that. I don’t know why anybody wants to change them, because we had amazing battles in Melbourne. We had great battles in China. Kimi and I have had a great battle today and yesterday, and that’s only possible because of how these power units are.”
The Reality Behind the Camera Angles
The question is, has F1 finally put to bed its troubled start to the season and solved the issues of the troublesome 50/50 engines?
Clearly sworn to not criticise the sport, the broadcasters continually fail to comment on the fact the engines are losing speed hundreds of metres along the back straight before they reach the final chicane. From the onboard cameras it looked as though the drivers were massively trail-braking, although the reality is they had run out of electrical power.
The other issue is that Canada is an outlier on the F1 circuit. Its layout is asymmetric in terms of energy recovery and deployment. The first half of the lap the drivers can easily harvest electrical power through the twists and turns, then on the run down to the chicane and the long back straight, the cars are starved of energy. In an attempt to reduce the nonsensical tricks the drivers are required to perform to harvest energy, in Montreal the FIA reduced the maximum amount of charge that could be recovered across a lap by 25%. This indeed did help the show somewhat, but the clever camera angles cutting away from the long shot on the back straight to a close-up halfway down were designed to minimise the impression of the cars losing speed.
Further, at the circuit on the Île Notre-Dame, the places for harvesting and deployment were fairly predictable and limited, so each of the teams ran similar electrical profiles. This prevented the much-criticised ‘yo-yo’ racing where the cars have different levels of battery power.
The Fight Over the 2027 Regulations
Russell railing against changes to the engines for 2027 was another hot topic in the Montreal paddock. The FIA have proposed that for 2027 the 50/50 split between the internal combustion engine (ICE) and the hybrid be altered.
By boosting the power of the ICE to 60% and reducing the battery element accordingly, it will reduce and potentially stop the cars decelerating at the end of the straights. This is because at present the internal combustion engine is charging the battery as well as driving the rear wheels, a phenomenon known as ‘super clipping.’
To prevent this, drivers are lifting and coasting to add charge to the battery, when in fact they should be racing flat out. The proposed changes would give drivers a more natural throttle feel, eliminate dramatic late-lap power drop-offs, and stop the sport from feeling like what Max Verstappen jokingly called a “battery world championship.”
Verstappen had threatened to quit F1 if the regulations were not changed and in Canada he confirmed the move next year to a 60/40 split in favour of the ICE was “the minimum” required to stop the fake racing.
Manufacturer Politics and the ADUO Loophole
As was the case back in Bahrain 2025, when the FIA proposed changing the split between the ICE and the hybrid, both Audi and Honda are resisting the changes. However, the FIA only need four of the six engine manufacturers to enforce the new rules, which would require some architecture changes to the hardware including increasing the fuel flow.
Mercedes and Red Bull-Ford are currently in favour of the changes, but Ferrari is hesitant, expressing concerns over the ADUO loophole. Under current rules, the FIA monitors an ICE Performance Index. If any manufacturer lags behind the top engine by 2% or more, they are granted ADUO (Additional Development and Upgrade Opportunities)—which gives them extra budget cap relief and development tokens to catch up.
Ferrari is in need of an ADUO opportunity as their engine is down on power when compared to Mercedes and Red Bull-Ford. They fear if the engine rules are completely reopened for 2027, the ADUO mechanism will be scrapped, wiping away their legal avenue to close the performance gap to Mercedes.
Conclusion: A Misleading Illusion
Ultimately, George Russell’s romanticised view of his Montreal duel misses the forest for the trees. While a chaotic, wheel-to-wheel scrap between teammates makes for sensational television, it is an optical illusion created by a unique circuit layout and the troublesome yo-yo racing will return again in Barcelona. Clever camera cuts and a last-minute 25% harvesting restriction cannot hide the fundamental flaw of the 2026 regulations: Formula One cars should not be visibly decelerating when three times the distance from the regular braking zones.
Would you like to see more TJ13 Formula 1 coverage? Add us to your favourites list on Google to receive trusted F1 news.
With over 30 years of experience in Formula 1 as an insider journalist, I have built trusted connections across the paddock, from race engineers and mechanics to senior team figures. At The Judge 13, I and a handful of trusted colleagues share exclusive Formula 1 news, expert analysis and behind-the-scenes stories you will not find in mainstream motorsport media.
A.J. Hunt is Senior Editor at TJ13, where Andrew oversees editorial standards and contributes to the site’s Formula 1 coverage. A career journalist with experience in both print and digital sports media, Andrew trained in investigative journalism and has written for a range of European sports outlets.
At TJ13, Andrew plays a central role in shaping the site’s output, working across breaking news, analysis, and long-form features. Andrew’s responsibilities include fact-checking, refining editorial structure, and ensuring consistency in reporting across a fast-moving news cycle.
Andrew’s work focuses particularly on the intersection of Formula 1 politics, regulation, and team strategy. Andrew closely follows developments involving the FIA, team leadership, and driver market dynamics, helping to provide context behind the sport’s biggest stories.
With experience covering multiple seasons of Formula 1’s modern hybrid era, Andrew has developed a detailed understanding of how regulatory changes and competitive shifts influence the grid. Andrew’s editorial approach prioritises clarity and context, aiming to help readers navigate complex developments within the sport.
In addition to editorial duties, Andrew is particularly interested in how media narratives shape fan perception of Formula 1, and how reporting can balance speed with accuracy in an increasingly digital news environment.
