“He talks a lot of crap!” claims Verstappen – Tensions surrounding Max Verstappen and his inner circle are rising after fresh criticism from Ralf Schumacher. The German pundit’s recent comments about Red Bull Racing have triggered a sharp response, this time from Verstappen’s father, Jos.
Schumacher’s analysis of Red Bull’s struggles has not been well received by the Verstappens, adding another layer of tension to an already turbulent period for the reigning world champion’s team.
Would you like to see more TJ13 Formula 1 coverage? Add us to your favourites list on Google to receive trusted F1 news.
What’s behind it?
There is little doubt that Red Bull’s 2026 campaign has fallen short of expectations thus far. However, the reasons for the team’s dip in performance remain unclear. This uncertainty has opened the door to speculation, with Schumacher being one of those offering his perspective.
Speaking on the “Backstage Pit Lane” podcast, he pointed to structural issues within the team. In particular, he highlighted the reduced presence of Helmut Marko as a key factor. According to Schumacher, the long-time advisor’s absence has left a leadership void, making it harder for Red Bull to maintain clear direction.
He also suggested that internal processes had become disjointed, citing a lack of communication and cohesion behind the scenes. In his view, these issues have made the team appear unsettled both on and off the track.
MORE NEWS – F1 rules under pressure: Helmut Marko raises urgent doubts over new changes
Verstappen camp responds
Jos Verstappen was quick to dismiss those claims. Responding to a report featuring Schumacher’s comments, he issued a blunt verdict on social media: “Ralf talks a lot of rubbish.”
This remark highlights just how sensitive the situation has become. While external criticism is nothing new in Formula 1, the direct nature of Jos Verstappen’s response signals clear frustration within the team. With results not matching expectations, any suggestion of internal instability is likely to be strongly contested by those closest to the team.
MORE F1 NEWS – FIA ban Mercedes F1 engine trick
Signs of unrest at Red Bull
Despite the pushback, Schumacher is far from alone in raising concerns. Observers across the paddock have noted that Red Bull has appeared unusually vulnerable in recent weeks.
The team’s difficulties have not been limited to on-track performance. Off the circuit, several incidents have fuelled the perception of unrest. Verstappen himself made headlines during the Japanese Grand Prix weekend after requesting the removal of a journalist from a press conference, an episode that drew widespread criticism.
At the same time, personnel changes have added to the sense of instability. The departure of key figures, including race engineer Gianpiero Lambiase, who is set to join McLaren, has raised questions about the team’s internal dynamics.
There are also ongoing rumours surrounding Hannah Schmitz, who has reportedly attracted interest from Ferrari. While nothing has been confirmed, the speculation alone has contributed to the narrative of a team in flux.
Whether or not Schumacher’s criticism proves accurate, one thing is clear: the combination of underwhelming results, high-profile departures and public disputes has created an environment in which every comment and every reaction carries added weight.
NEXT ARTICLE – Fans ditching F1 as viewer numbers collapse
As predicted by the independent F1 press before the season opener, the all-new 2026 era is rapidly descending into farce. A huge plunge in viewer numbers following the Japanese Grand Prix makes plain the fans are voting with their feet.
The fundamental architecture of the 50/50 power units was flawed from its inception. As Stefano Domenicali, F1 supremo, admitted in 2025, the resulting regulations were a “political” decision based on attracting more manufacturers into the sport.
Whilst the FIA working party on the next generation of F1 engines was formed in 2017, it was in 2020 that the first mention of the all-new 50/50 power unit was made. As the name suggests, the power contribution from the internal combustion engine would be 50%, as it would be from the battery.
F1 manufacturers mis-read the future of road cars
A bold new step into greater efficiency and the electrified future was the intention, yet increasing the current electrical output by three times was always going to be ambitious. For many auto manufacturers who did not believe in the coming of the EV revolution, hybrids would be the bulk of the future road cars they produced.
And whilst hybrids have become a transitional technology in the auto industry, they have significant disadvantages compared to either the internal combustion engine or full electric cars. They contain the bulk of both an internal combustion engine along with the weight of a battery and, given the average person is…CONTINUE TO READ THIS STORY
Alex Stanton is a Formula 1 journalist at TJ13 with a focus on the financial and commercial dynamics that underpin the sport. Alex contributes reporting and analysis on team ownership structures, sponsorship trends, and the evolving business model of Formula 1.
At TJ13, Alex covers topics including manufacturer investment, cost cap implications, and the strategic direction of teams navigating an increasingly complex financial environment. Alex’s work often examines how commercial decisions translate into on-track performance and long-term competitiveness.
With a strong interest in the intersection of sport and business, Alex provides context around Formula 1’s global growth, including media rights, expansion markets, and manufacturer influence.
Alex’s reporting aims to explain the financial realities behind headline stories, helping readers understand how money, governance, and strategy shape the competitive order in Formula 1.
Whilst I’m not a huge fan of Ralf S OR V Snr … the latter’s not wrong here, is he!
The mass exodus from Milton Keynes says it all