Ferrari in chaos: Hamilton-Leclerc drama mars Miami Grand Prix strategy – The Miami Grand Prix provided its fair share of high-speed drama, but much of it came not from the cars or the wheel-to-wheel action – but from within the walls of the Ferrari garage. What should have been a routine execution of race strategy instead turned into a public display of indecision, miscommunication and internal tension between Charles Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton.
At a time when Ferrari is still trying to integrate its new star signing and rebuild its championship ambitions, Miami exposed deep-seated problems that Ferrari can no longer ignore. The catalyst for the chaos was the ill-timed use of the Virtual Safety Car, which effectively torpedoed Leclerc’s original race strategy. Leading Hamilton at the time, the Monegasque was preparing for his pit stop when the VSC was activated just as he crossed the start-finish line. The system was deactivated moments later, allowing Leclerc to pit under green flag conditions while his rivals, including Hamilton, gained time during the slowdown.
A strategic collapse begins with bad timing
Hamilton, who had started on the harder compound and later switched to medium, suddenly found himself within touching distance of Leclerc on the track. The pace advantage that came with the fresher and softer rubber allowed the seven-time world champion to quickly close the gap.
Initially, it looked as if Ferrari were in a position of strength. On lap 34, Leclerc passed Carlos Sainz and Hamilton cleverly followed him through the gap to complete a neat double overtake. It should have been a moment of celebration. Instead, it sparked a four-lap dispute over track position and team orders that quickly descended into farce.
Bio fuel crisis: $300 per litre
Hamilton’s growing frustration
Hamilton, recognising his performance advantage, immediately asked to be let through.
“I’m just burning my tyres here,” he said over the team radio. When no instruction came, his irritation grew. “Am I supposed to sit here for the whole race?” he asked.
Engineer Riccardo Adami responded with a vague, non-committal instruction: “Just keep the DRS on Charles.”
Hamilton was unimpressed: “You guys… man!”
The team seemed hesitant, fearing that if Hamilton overtook Leclerc, both he and Sainz might find their way past the Monegasque. To avoid this, they opted to use Leclerc as a DRS buffer – an approach that only wasted time and cost Hamilton tyre life.
Finally, on lap 38, Ferrari gave in. Leclerc was told to switch positions at turn 17, four laps into the debate. By this time, Hamilton’s tyres had deteriorated significantly, making it harder for him to pull away or attack Mercedes rookie Andrea Kimi Antonelli, who was still in front.
In perhaps the most pointed radio message of the day, Hamilton fired back at the late call: “It’s not good teamwork. In China, I made way when you asked me to. What are team mates for? Come on!”
Second round of confusion: Roles reversed
Ironically, just as things were settling down, they began to fall apart again – this time in the opposite direction. As Hamilton’s tyres faded and Leclerc’s harder compound began to take effect, it became clear that the Monegasque was now the faster driver. The team then asked Hamilton to hand back his place to Leclerc at Turn 11 on lap 51.
But Hamilton didn’t get the message in time. He was still concentrating on closing the gap to Antonelli and questioned the timing of the instruction.
“So you don’t want me to close any more?” he asked, suspecting that another team miscalculation was unfolding in real time.
Leclerc, for his part, tried to remain calm.
“It’s OK. We see Antonelli. Let’s try. If not, we’ll waste more time here than anything else,” he replied.
Eventually, Hamilton did make it – on the third attempt, one lap later than planned. But the damage was done. The gap to Antonelli had grown too wide for Leclerc to mount a meaningful challenge.
The final laps: A fractured finish
In the final laps, Hamilton’s performance deteriorated and Sainz began to reel him in. The Ferrari pit wall, perhaps realising the implications of another position lost, warned Hamilton of the looming threat: “Sainz 1.4”.
Hamilton’s response was dripping with sarcasm: “Should I let him pass too?”
Despite the tension, Hamilton managed to hold off Sainz in a side-by-side duel through the final corner, eventually crossing the line just 0.391 seconds ahead of the Spaniard. It was a grim end to a race that had left the Ferrari garage in damage control mode. On the cool-down lap, Hamilton remained silent – in stark contrast to the exasperated driver heard on the radio for much of the second half of the race.
Ferrari disaster but Hamilton profits
The pundits’ verdict: “A bit embarrassing”
‘Rent a Quote’ go-to, Sky Germany pundit Ralf Schumacher didn’t mince his words in his post-race analysis.
“It was unfortunate for him. He was faster for a while because he supposedly had the better tyres. He fought hard to get to the front,” explained Schumacher.
“That’s fine, but then it’s doubly embarrassing when you’re too slow and don’t want to give up the position. Normally you do it like that and then you give it back voluntarily.” the German said, slamming Hamilton’s reluctance and sarcasm toward the team.
Schumacher’s verdict was clear: Ferrari lacked decisiveness and Hamilton didn’t help by letting his emotions dictate the situation.
Hamilton reacts: Frustration and regret
After the race, Hamilton attempted to walk back some of the sharper edges of his mid-race radio.
“Some people might not like it, but some of it was just sarcastic,” he said. “You have to understand: We are under a lot of pressure in these cars. In the heat of the moment, no diplomatic messages get through.”
Nevertheless, Hamilton couldn’t hide his frustration at the team’s slow decision-making.
“I was much quicker at that moment and I think I could have got Antonelli if the decision had been made earlier. I have no problem with the team or with Charles, but we need to improve”.
He added that he had already spoken to team boss Frederic Vasseur in an attempt to defuse the tension.
“Fred came up to me after the race. I just patted him on the shoulder – as if to say: ‘Don’t get upset, don’t take it too seriously. I could have said a lot worse on the radio – others have done that in the past.”
Leclerc’s calm response
Ever the diplomat in red, Leclerc played down any suggestion of friction within the team.
“I knew Lewis was on medium and that he’d have more to fight for at the back. But I also understand that he wanted to do things differently,” he said.
Acknowledging the strategic mistakes, he stressed the need for internal improvement.
“We have to do better, that’s for sure. It’s clear that this is not the way we want to run our races. We will discuss it internally to make better decisions.”
Asked if there were any lingering problems with Hamilton, he dismissed the idea out of hand: “There are no hard feelings towards Lewis, absolutely not.”
He even sympathised with his team-mate.
“You’re fighting for eighth place and not making any progress. I was really struggling with the car – that’s the frustration, and then everything else comes along. The radio doesn’t always give a true picture.”
‘Exciting’ Perez appearance in Miami
Bigger questions for Ferrari
Ferrari entered 2025 with a bold plan: pair a generational talent in Leclerc with a seven-time champion in Hamilton to end the long wait for a constructors’ title. But instead of launching a title challenge, the team is now fumbling strategy decisions and risking internal rifts that could destabilise the season.
Hamilton’s move to Ferrari was always going to attract scrutiny. Aside from a sprint win in China, the Briton has yet to make a significant mark in race trim, and Miami has added tension to an already difficult transition.
For Ferrari, the question is no longer whether they have two fast drivers, but whether they can manage them both without collapsing under the weight of their own indecision. If Miami is any indication, the answer is still very much in doubt.
What do you think of Ferrari’s handling of the situation in Miami?
Red Bull refrained from the ultimate call to Tsunoda
READ MORE F1 NEWS – McLaren concern as “weakness” exposed by Red Bull
Max Verstappen claimed his third Grand Prix pole position of the 2025 season, not bad for a driver who has been given the least competitive car produced by Red Bull in over half a decade. Then again could it be that the Milton Keynes based squad are sandbagging?
Speaking after another Verstappen pole position, a visibly disappointed Andreas Stella went on to claim that he believes the RB21 is a better car than most people believe. Max is the first driver to rack up three GP pole positions this year, pipping Lando Norris in Japan and Miami and Oscar Piastri in Jeddah.
McLaren’s ‘cool’ Aussie driver leads the world championship from his team mate by nine points, but Verstappen lurks not far behind despite a disappointing Sprint race result which saw him handed a time penalty and with the mini race finishing behind the safety car, Verstappen’s fourth on the road quickly became seventeenth when the ten second time penalty was applied…. READ MORE ON THIS STORY
The Judge, a nom de plume of an experienced F1 journalist and site founder with long-standing sources across the paddock. With over 30 years of experience in Formula 1 as an insider journalist, I have built trusted connections across the paddock, from race engineers and mechanics to senior team figures. At The Judge 13, I and a handful of trusted colleagues share exclusive Formula 1 news, expert analysis and behind-the-scenes stories you will not find in mainstream motorsport media.
Typical Schumacher. Remember Ralph, to paraphrase “those who can carry on doing so, those that can’t just mouth off without accountability”. Zip it lad.
Ferrari pit stops have historically been shambles, all the way back to the days of Henry N Manney III, writing for Road and Track. Why should strategy be different?