FIA reprimands Verstappen’s slow outlap in Miami sprint qualifying – The FIA has officially reprimanded Red Bull Racing following an incident involving Max Verstappen during Sprint Qualifying 2 (SQ2) at the Miami Grand Prix, in which the Dutchman exceeded the maximum allowed outlap time.
While Verstappen himself escaped with no grid penalty or sporting sanction, the team was held responsible for the infraction following a hearing with the stewards, who found no malicious intent or safety hazard, but deemed the infraction avoidable.
Ferrari’s subtle denouncement of FIA 2026 engine rules
Verstappen oversteps the limit
During SQ2 on the streets of Miami, Verstappen recorded an outlap that was approximately six seconds slower than the maximum allowed time of 1 minute 45 seconds, a threshold introduced by the FIA to prevent risky discrepancies in track speeds during qualifying. This rule is designed to avoid potentially dangerous situations where some drivers are at full throttle while others are crawling to maintain tyre temperature and spacing, particularly on narrow or twisty sections of the track.
Verstappen’s slow lap raised eyebrows and the FIA promptly summoned both the driver and a Red Bull Racing representative to explain the circumstances. The central issue turned out to be a faulty delta time displayed on Verstappen’s dashboard, which incorrectly informed the reigning world champion that he was within the prescribed limit.
Red Bull software configuration to blame
The stewards’ report confirmed that the error was caused by incorrect programming within Red Bull’s software systems. This glitch in the delta display meant that Verstappen believed he was driving at a compliant speed, when in fact he was well below the required speed. Red Bull only realised the problem after the pit stop and corrected the information given to Verstappen over the team radio.
With the correct data provided, Verstappen adjusted his pace and stayed within the time limits for all subsequent laps. Telemetry from the FIA and Red Bull corroborated this timeline of events, indicating that the problem was quickly identified and corrected.
“The error was detected after the first lap and from that point on the driver drove correctly,” read an extract from the FIA statement. “Car 1 was approximately six seconds over the required minimum time, but this was at a constant speed with no other cars in the vicinity.”
No intent or risk observed by stewards
One of the key elements in the stewards’ leniency was that Verstappen’s slow lap did not pose a safety concern. The data showed that the Red Bull driver maintained a consistent speed throughout the lap and was alone on track at the time, reducing the risk of obstructing or endangering others. The stewards stressed that had there been other cars on the track, or had Verstappen’s driving contributed to any form of obstruction, a more severe penalty could have been imposed.
“In the opinion of the stewards, this was a breach of the rules, but without any danger to others,” the report continued. “In other circumstances – for example, if there had been traffic on the track – a more severe penalty would have been appropriate.”
As a result, Red Bull received an official reprimand, the lightest form of disciplinary action available under the FIA’s sporting code. The team is now responsible for ensuring that the software systems used to display real-time lap information to its drivers are fully functional and accurate for the race.
Separate incident involving Lance Stroll dismissed
The stewards also clarified that Verstappen’s slow outlap in SQ2 was not related to an earlier incident involving Aston Martin driver Lance Stroll. In SQ1, Verstappen was on the racing line approaching the final corner when Stroll, coming in at high speed, was forced to swerve into the braking zone to avoid a potential collision. Stroll immediately described the situation as “dangerous” on his team radio.
However, the FIA decided not to investigate the SQ1 encounter further, citing a lack of actionable interference. Although Stroll missed out on advancing to SQ2 by just a tenth of a second, the governing body concluded that Verstappen’s presence on the track did not warrant disciplinary action.
Antonelli takes surprise pole as Verstappen settles for fourth
Despite the minor controversy, Verstappen continued his sprint qualifying session without further problems, eventually securing fourth place on the grid for the sprint race. The session produced a surprise pole position for Mercedes junior Andrea Kimi Antonelli, who outpaced both McLaren drivers in an outstanding performance.
The young Italian’s success underlined the unpredictable nature of the sprint format and the developing competitiveness in the midfield.
Verstappen, meanwhile, has played down expectations for the Miami weekend, warning that the heat and high levels of tyre degradation could favour McLaren’s set-up and strategic options. Still sorting out the reliability of their software and telemetry systems, Red Bull now face a race against time to ensure their tools are fully restored for the remainder of the Grand Prix weekend.
Hamilton criticised for monosyllabic answers after Ferrari clampdown on negativities
Red Bull’s technical failure raises questions about software reliability
This latest episode adds to the growing scrutiny on the role of software reliability in modern Formula One. With teams operating on razor-thin margins of performance and compliance, even a minor technical miscalculation can lead to official reprimands or penalties, even in cases where the driver is blameless.
The outlap incident in Miami highlights the importance of accurate data streams, not only for competitive performance, but also for compliance with FIA regulations.
Red Bull will be expected to review their systems ahead of Sunday’s main race and address any underlying issues that could lead to a repeat of the situation. Although no sporting penalty was imposed this time around, repeated infractions – whether intentional or not – could result in a harsher response in the future, especially if they occur in a crowded or high-stakes qualifying scenario.
For Verstappen, the incident was little more than a hiccup in a weekend where track conditions and tyre strategy are likely to have a far greater influence on the outcome. For now, Red Bull leave Miami’s sprint qualifying session with just a warning and a lesson learned.
MORE F1 NEWS – Drastic mid-season F1 rules changes considered by FIA
Once the game has begun, changing the rules before it finishes is considered to be unfair. There would be questions asked about the motivation to change the regulations together with someone who benefits more than another. This is why rule changes mid-season in Formula One are a rare thing.
Of course the FIA will tidy up grey areas with technical directives, but something like changing tyre compounds (done once for safety) will affect the pecking order, with some teams winning whilst others lose out.
However, Formula One has a problem at present and much of it is around the design regulations for the cars. There are fixes coming next year to reduce the amount of dirty air a driver behind an other car suffers, but for now this is proving a significant issue, with four of the first five Grand Prix this year being won from pole position… READ MORE ON THIS STORY
With over 30 years of experience in Formula 1 as an insider journalist, I have built trusted connections across the paddock, from race engineers and mechanics to senior team figures. At The Judge 13, I and a handful of trusted colleagues share exclusive Formula 1 news, expert analysis and behind-the-scenes stories you will not find in mainstream motorsport media.
