Formula 1 made money from a French Grand Prix that never happened, a €550,000 feasibility study for Nice Grand Prix sparks controversy – The return of a Formula 1 Grand Prix to France has long been a topic of debate among motorsport enthusiasts and politicians. However, the feasibility study carried out for a potential race in Nice has now come under scrutiny due to its high cost and the apparent lack of transparency surrounding its commissioning.
According to an investigation by Mediapart, a staggering €550,000 has been spent on a study that has produced no tangible results, raising serious questions about financial oversight and Formula One’s involvement in the matter.
A controversial attempt to revive the French Grand Prix
Following the cancellation of the French Grand Prix at the Paul Ricard circuit, often criticised for its lack of excitement and logistical challenges, the Public Interest Group (GIP) that oversees the race sought alternatives. Under the leadership of Eric Boullier, the organisation explored the possibility of holding a Grand Prix in Nice, a move that was backed by the city’s mayor, Christian Estrosi.
Estrosi, a well-known supporter of motorsport, was also President of the Alpes-Maritimes General Council at the time and had expressed his enthusiasm for bringing a Formula One race to the city.
Unlike Paul Ricard, which is in a relatively remote rural location, Nice offered an urban setting that could enhance the spectacle of the race. But despite the apparent appeal of the idea, the feasibility study commissioned to investigate its viability has now come under fire.
Red Bull rethink Liam Lawson’s role
Honda on the back foot with 2026 engine and Tsunoda is on his own
Did Formula 1 benefit unfairly?
Reports suggest that the €550,000 study was awarded to the Formula One World Championship (FOWC) without full disclosure to the administrators of the GIP. Adding to the controversy is the fact that no official report has been produced to justify the expenditure, as noted by the Regional Audit Chamber of Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur (CRC).
This revelation has led to speculation that Formula 1 may have benefited financially from the project without providing any substantive analysis.
If this is the case, it would suggest that taxpayers’ money has been used inefficiently, especially given the already precarious financial situation of the GIP.
Audi F1 accept they need a UK F1 base
Nice’s Grand Prix proposal: A flawed concept?
If the Nice Grand Prix had gone ahead, the circuit would have been built around the Allianz Riviera stadium, a modern sports facility inaugurated in 2013.
However, the logistical and financial implications of such an event were significant. Nice’s proximity to Monaco was another major drawback, as the economic benefits of having a second race so close were questionable.
The cost of building an entirely new circuit infrastructure in an urban environment would have been exorbitant, requiring substantial public investment. Moreover, Formula One’s prioritisation of new venues in line with Liberty Media’s expansion strategy made the Nice project an even riskier proposition.
Ecclestone and Red Bull boss in mega-million dollar deal
Christian Estrosi’s changing position raises eyebrows
One of the most striking aspects of this controversy is Christian Estrosi’s apparent change of position on the feasibility of an F1 race in Nice. Just days before the first payment for the study was made, Estrosi dismissed the idea of a French Grand Prix in the city, saying: “I don’t see under what conditions we could organise it in Nice.”
By 2024, however, his position seemed to have changed significantly, as he later claimed that Nice had “all the assets” to host a Grand Prix. This contradiction has only added to the scepticism surrounding the study and its motivations.
Fans demand sacking of Sky F1 presenter
The GIP’s questionable financial decisions
The CRC’s report highlighted significant concerns about the way in which the GIP was managing funds, particularly given the financial difficulties it was already facing. The organisation was aware that Formula One Management (FOM) had no interest in renewing a Grand Prix contract at Paul Ricard, yet it proceeded with negotiations regarding Nice without proper authorisation.
The decision to spend €550,000 on a study that produced no visible results is seen as an abuse of authority. It raises concerns not only about the governance of the GIP, but also about how public funds were allocated to a project that had little chance of materialising.
Newey “massively” surprised by Lance Stroll
Exaggerated economic benefits?
The potential financial benefits of a Grand Prix in Nice have also been questioned. The CRC report suggests that the economic impact forecasts presented by the GIP were overly optimistic.
While the organisation argued that hosting a race would bring significant revenue to the region, independent studies have shown that Formula One events often have little to no net economic benefit – and in some cases can even be detrimental.
Between 2018 and 2022, a total of €101.5 million in public funds will be spent on hosting four editions of the French Grand Prix. Given these figures, the idea of committing further resources to an unproven project was bound to attract criticism.
Marko issues warning to Hamilton
Where does the French Grand Prix go from here?
With the Nice project in serious doubt, attention has once again turned to whether France will see the return of its Grand Prix in the near future. The most likely candidate remains the Paul Ricard circuit, despite all the criticism in the past.
Paul Ricard remains an FIA Grade 1 circuit with the necessary infrastructure to host a Formula One race. Christian Estrosi himself acknowledged that the circuit meets most of the FOM’s requirements, including previous experience, facilities and logistics. However, the general perception that the circuit lacks excitement remains a significant obstacle.
Liberty Media, the current owners of F1, may be reluctant to return to a venue that has failed to generate widespread enthusiasm among fans and stakeholders.
The last French Grand Prix was held under a contract dating back to the Bernie Ecclestone era, when Ecclestone himself owned the Paul Ricard circuit. With new commercial priorities and an increasing focus on expanding F1 into emerging markets, France is not currently high on Liberty Media’s agenda.
Red Bull hit back at Newey criticism
Paris emerging as a new contender?
While Paul Ricard remains the default option, some voices in the paddock have suggested that a Grand Prix in Paris would be a more viable alternative. Flavio Briatore, a long-time figure in Formula One, has argued that a race in the French capital would make more sense given the city’s superior infrastructure, transport links and accommodation capacity.
Briatore pointed out that F1’s global sponsors and business partners need a location that can accommodate a high-end clientele.
“Today, with all the sponsors behind F1 and all the people working around it, it is imperative to have significant hotel capacity. And it is not Castellet that can offer that. Paris, yes,” he explains.
Verstappen already writing off victory
Disneyland Grand Prix proposal
Former Renault team principal Flavio Briatore has proposed bringing the race back to the Paris region, and has suggested an unconventional venue: Disneyland Paris.
Briatore’s proposal aims to move away from traditional circuits such as Magny-Cours and Le Castellet, both of which have faced logistical challenges in hosting the event in the past.
“In my opinion, the French Grand Prix is a major omission from the Formula One calendar,” he told Le Figaro. “But I do not think it is appropriate to return to Magny-Cours, which is in an isolated area, or to Le Castellet, where traffic problems make access difficult. The race should take place in Paris”.
While a race through the streets of central Paris – perhaps with cars racing past the Eiffel Tower or along the Seine – would be a dream for F1 fans, Briatore admits that such a plan would be logistically complex. “It is not necessary for the race to be held in the centre of Paris, although it would be wonderful,” he admits.
Instead, he suggests Disneyland Paris as a possible venue. The famous theme park, located in Marne-la-Vallée on the outskirts of the French capital, offers vast open spaces and a well-developed infrastructure that could accommodate the event.
McLaren now the off track bitter Red Bull rivals
A future in limbo
The controversy surrounding the Nice Grand Prix feasibility study has added another layer of uncertainty to the future of Formula One in France. The mismanagement of public funds, combined with unrealistic economic forecasts and shifting political narratives, has cast doubt on the possibility of a sustainable return of the French Grand Prix.
Unless a clear, transparent and financially viable strategy is put in place, France risks being left off the F1 calendar for the foreseeable future. Whether Paul Ricard, Paris or another alternative emerges as the new host, one thing is clear: the return of Formula One to France will require much more careful planning and accountability than was demonstrated with the Nice Grand Prix project.
READ MORE – ‘Verstappen sensational move to Ferrari’
MORE F1 NEWS – Honda on the back foot with 2026 engine and Tsunoda is on his own
Honda have a habit of ditching their F1 adventures at relatively short notice, then deciding other wise at a later date. They famously sold their team with the 2009 car designed and constructed to Ross Brawn for £1. The Brit then branded it Brawn GP and negotiated nine months salaries from Honda, as redundancy pay for the staff.
With meagre sponsorship from Virgin and a few others, Brawn GP set about revolutionising the modern F1 pecking order as they stormed to both championships, with Jenson Button claiming the drivers honours that season.
The Japanese manufacturer decided in 2021 that they would not be taking part in Formula One when the new power unit designs came into force in 2026. Red Bull dutifully poached key engineers from their staff for the Red Bull Powertrain programme designed to replace Honda…READ MORE ON THIS STORY
With over 30 years of experience in Formula 1 as an insider journalist, I have built trusted connections across the paddock, from race engineers and mechanics to senior team figures. At The Judge 13, I and a handful of trusted colleagues share exclusive Formula 1 news, expert analysis and behind-the-scenes stories you will not find in mainstream motorsport media.
