Last Updated on September 19 2024, 11:04 am
The FIA calls for reduction in swearing on Formula One broadcasts demanding that “we need to differentiate between motorsport and rap music,” – The landscape of Formula 1 broadcasting could be set for a significant change as the FIA (Fédération Internationale de l’Automobile) calls for a reduction in the amount of swearing broadcast during races. But is the president out of line with such censorship?
While profane outbursts from drivers are often censored with beeps or bleeps, the increasing frequency and intensity of such language has raised concerns from the sport’s governing body.

FIA President Mohammed bin Sulayem made his position clear in an interview with the Dutch edition of *Motorsport.com*, stating that the language used by drivers must be held to a higher standard than that commonly heard in other forms of media, such as rap music.
“We have to make a distinction between our sport, motorsport, and rap music,” said bin Sulayem.
“We are not rappers. How many times a minute do they say the F-word? That’s not us. That’s them, and we’re us.”
Perceived targeting of Hamilton?
Although Hamilton is rarely heard using profanity on the radio, FIA President Mohammed bin Sulayem’s recent comments on swearing and his reference to “rappers” as a negative example have sparked controversy, especially in light of his past actions. Some have interpreted these actions as an indication that bin Sulayem views Hamilton and the culture he represents as being at odds with the traditional values of Formula One.
One notable example was the FIA’s enforcement of a long-standing but previously unenforced rule banning drivers from wearing jewellery during races, which many believed was specifically aimed at Hamilton.
The seven-time world champion, known for his bold fashion choices and personal style, has often embraced elements of black culture and street fashion, which includes wearing jewellery and promoting the values of self-expression. Many see bin Sulayem’s recent reference to rappers as another veiled criticism of the culture that Hamilton represents in Formula One – a culture that challenges the traditionally rigid and elitist norms of the sport.
By highlighting Hamilton’s visible markers of identity, some argue that the FIA president is reinforcing an exclusionary vision of F1 that distances itself from the cultural diversity that Hamilton embodies and champions.
Red Bull surprise announcement coming in Singapore
The emotional nature of racing
Bin Sulayem, a former Middle East rally champion, acknowledged that racing is an emotional sport and that drivers are often pushed to the limit, which can lead to moments of frustration and anger. However, he stressed the need to maintain a sense of professionalism.
“I know, I was a driver myself,” he said, expressing empathy for those behind the wheel. “I would be angry too. But we have to be careful with our behaviour. We have to be sensible people.
Tempers often flare in the high-pressure environment of Formula One, with drivers often venting their frustrations over team radios during races. These radio messages, many of which are broadcast live, have become a key aspect of the sport’s appeal, giving fans a behind-the-scenes look at the raw emotions of the drivers as they battle for every tenth of a second.
However, the advent of live, unfiltered broadcasts has raised questions about how much of that raw emotion should be shared with a global audience, particularly one that includes young viewers.
“With today’s technology, everything is live and everything is recorded. We have to look at that and then see if we can reduce what is said in public,” said bin Sulayem. He added: “Imagine you’re sitting with your children watching the race and someone says all these dirty words. I mean, what would your children or grandchildren say? What would you teach them if it was your sport?”
Astonishing value of crash bill for Perez in 2024
FIA’s approach to reducing on-air swearing
One of the measures being considered is a direct request to FOM (Formula One Management), the group responsible for producing and broadcasting Formula One races, to reduce the number of radio messages containing inappropriate language. Bin Sulayem confirmed that the FIA had already raised the issue with FOM.
“We can and we have,” said bin Sulayem when asked if the FIA could ask FOM to limit these broadcasts. “We are the ones who have even asked for more radio, but that can be disruptive.”
The FIA President stressed that the organisation’s primary objective is to protect the integrity of the sport and to ensure that the rules, including those on public communications, are followed. “We have rules and the rules are there for the good of the sport and the rules must be monitored and respected,” he stressed.
Marko appears to be throwing in the towel: “If I’m honest, yes”
A growing concern: The link between negative comments and online abuse
The FIA’s concerns about swearing and inappropriate behaviour on the airwaves are not isolated. In recent months, the organisation has been looking at wider issues relating to the language and behaviour of drivers and team members. During the summer break, bin Sulayem posted a statement on his Instagram account addressing the need for better behaviour in the sport.
“As part of our ongoing fight against online abuse, recent research has shown that there is a direct correlation between negative comments made by drivers and team members and the increasing hatred of officials on social media,” bin Sulayem’s statement read.
The statement followed the FIA’s decision to amend the definition of “misconduct” within the International Sporting Code (ISC), a move aimed at curbing inflammatory remarks that could incite abuse towards officials and staff.
“At the last World Motor Sport Council, members agreed to amend the definition of misconduct within the ISC following incidents where senior members of our sport have made comments to officials that have incited abuse,” the FIA President said.
FIA’s decision on McLaren “illegal” rear wing
Political and social comments also under scrutiny
This latest focus on language is part of a wider effort by the FIA to enforce stricter controls on public behaviour in Formula One. At the end of 2022, the FIA introduced a controversial rule that banned drivers from making political, religious or personal statements unless they had been approved in advance. This was seen as an attempt to uphold the principle of neutrality within the sport, but it also raised questions about how much freedom drivers should have to express their views both on and off the track.
The rule was part of a growing debate about the role of athletes in making public statements on global issues. Some drivers, such as Lewis Hamilton and Sebastian Vettel, have used their platforms to speak out on issues such as human rights, environmental concerns and racial equality. But the FIA’s new rules made it clear that the organisation wanted to distance the sport from overt political activism.
Mercedes boss declines design guru Newey
FIA president out of line?
While FIA President Mohammed bin Sulayem’s intentions to curb the use of profanity during live F1 broadcasts are noble, his comments reveal a worrying disconnect with younger generations and their everyday media consumption. In a world where online platforms such as YouTube, TikTok and streaming services expose audiences to unfiltered language, efforts to sanitise F1 broadcasts may seem out of touch.
Younger fans, in particular, are already used to hearing colourful language in various forms of media, and F1 drivers, like any athletes under intense pressure, often express raw emotions. Trying to impose a sterilised version of reality on live broadcasts can feel forced and inauthentic to the younger demographic the sport is trying to attract.
Furthermore, bin Sulayem’s reference to “rappers” as an example of inappropriate language is problematic. It perpetuates harmful stereotypes that portray rap music, a form of expression deeply rooted in black culture, as inherently negative.
By drawing a distinction between motorsport and rap, the comment risks associating F1 with an air of elitism and reinforcing the marginalisation of black culture. The sport is already criticised for its exclusivity and perceived distance from the concerns of under-represented communities, and comments like this only widen the gap. Rather than singling out rap music, a more nuanced approach to language and culture in F1 would better reflect the diversity of its growing global audience and avoid reinforcing racial or cultural stereotypes that continue to marginalise certain groups.
Red Bull surprise announcement coming in Singapore
The future of Formula 1 broadcasting
As the FIA takes steps to manage driver behaviour both on and off the track, the question remains as to how much these changes will affect the broadcast experience for fans. Will there be fewer beeps interrupting the excitement of a race, or will drivers simply be more restrained in their public language?
For bin Sulayem, the answer seems clear: Formula One must continue to distinguish itself as a professional sport, one that is suitable for audiences of all ages and one that is careful about the messages it sends. How the drivers and teams respond to these calls for restraint will be key to the future tone of the sport.
READ MORE: Russell debunks huge F1 myth
MORE F1 NEWs – Bottas: My F1 retirement
Bottas mulls F1 exit as Zhou eyeing reserve role – As the 2025 Formula One season approaches, uncertainty surrounds the futures of Sauber drivers Valtteri Bottas and Guanyu Zhou. Both drivers face significant challenges in retaining their positions within the Sauber team as they vie for the remaining seat next season.
While the experienced Bottas is exploring potential opportunities outside the elite series, Zhou seems resigned to a supporting role within Formula One. Valtteri Bottas, the Finnish driver with an impressive F1 pedigree, finds himself in a precarious position. His future with Sauber, the team expected to rebrand as Audi in 2026, is under threat as the team evaluates its options for the second cockpit alongside Nico Hulkenberg for the 2025 season.
While Bottas remains a strong contender for the seat, but there is no guarantee that he will be retained and the uncertainty has led him to explore alternative career paths. Indeed it appears he himself is admitting to Formula 1 retirement and a move to another racing series according to sources within…READ MORE ON THIS STORY
With over 30 years of experience in Formula 1 as an insider journalist, I have built trusted connections across the paddock, from race engineers and mechanics to senior team figures. At The Judge 13, I and a handful of trusted colleagues share exclusive Formula 1 news, expert analysis and behind-the-scenes stories you will not find in mainstream motorsport media.
