Red Bull: Steiner spectacular F1 comeback. In Formula 1, strategic manoeuvring off the track is often as important as performance on it. This year, the spotlight is on Red Bull Racing and its B team, the Racing Bulls, as they navigate potential changes in ownership and ambitious competitive goals.
In the midst of all this, rumours have surfaced of a spectacular return to the F1 scene for former Haas team principal Guenther Steiner, not just in a management role, but as a co-owner. Which, if true, would be somewhat ironic given that co-ownership was said to be at the heart of why the former boss was sacked from the Haas team in the first place.

Background: The rise of Haas F1 and Steiner’s role
The Italian-born team principal, known for his fiery demeanour and outspoken personality, has been at odds with Haas F1 Team founder Gene Haas over the strategic direction and ownership of the team.
Haas F1 Team burst onto the Formula One scene in 2016 under the leadership of Gene Haas, an American entrepreneur with a successful background in CNC machinery and NASCAR team ownership. Guenther Steiner, with his extensive background in various motorsport disciplines, was brought on board to steer the team. Under his leadership, Haas made a promising start, challenging the mid-field and earning respect throughout the paddock.
Steiner was instrumental in navigating the team through the complexities of F1’s technical and regulatory landscape. He became a familiar face on the Netflix series Drive to Survive, where his straightforward approach and memorable one-liners won him fans around the world.
Horner to give evidence as affair reopened
The Disagreement: Shares and strategic vision
The root of the conflict between Steiner and Haas revolved around the ownership and future direction of the team. Sources close to the team suggest that Steiner, buoyed by his success and popularity, wanted a greater share of the team’s ownership. He believed that a shareholding would not only reflect his contribution, but also align the long-term interests of the team with his strategic vision.
Steiner’s approach to running the team was reportedly more aggressive than Haas’. He favoured bold moves in both driver selection and technical partnerships, aiming to push the team beyond its mid-field status. This ambition required investment and a level of risk that Gene Haas was reluctant to take, especially given the volatile financial nature of Formula One.
Mercedes engineer contradicts Wolff
The climax: A pivotal meeting and a decision
Tensions reached a climax during a series of crucial meetings to chart the future course of Haas F1. According to insiders, these meetings were tense, with both parties laying out their visions for the team. Steiner pushed for a model that would use his public profile and F1 expertise to attract better sponsors and technical partners, thereby increasing the team’s competitive edge.
Gene Haas, on the other hand, was wary of the financial implications of such strategies. His approach was more conservative, focusing on gradual growth and stability rather than aggressive expansion. The disagreement over the shares became a symbolic battleground for these conflicting strategies.
Ultimately, the disagreement culminated in Gene Haas taking the difficult decision to fire Steiner. The decision was not taken lightly as Steiner had become synonymous with Haas F1 in the public eye. However, from a business perspective, Haas felt that retaining full control was essential to maintaining the team’s financial health and aligning it with his more cautious strategic outlook.
Alpine F1 sale now with “conditions”
Guenther Steiner’s potential F1 comeback
Now working as an RTL pundit, Steiner’s absence from the circuit could be coming to an end. Japanese racing news site autosportweb reports that Steiner is actively seeking a return to Formula One, possibly as a team owner. While details remain scarce, it is understood that Steiner has secured the backing of at least one investor who is interested in taking the plunge into the world of F1 with him.
The team at the centre of the speculation? The Racing Bulls, Red Bull’s B-team, which is said to be on the market. Helmut Marko, Red Bull Racing’s advisor, has indicated a strong interest in the team, although no decisions have been made. The move could mark a significant shift in the dynamics of the paddock, with Steiner playing a key role.
Mercedes on ‘abandoning’ W15 and looking to 2026
Red Bull’s investment strategy
Red Bull are not just looking to sell, they are looking to strategically increase the value of the Racing Bulls. According to sources, the plan for 2024 is robust – to take Racing Bulls to sixth place in the Constructors’ Championship, a position that could significantly increase the team’s market value.
Such an achievement would not only reflect well on the operational efficiency of Red Bull’s management, but would also make Racing Bulls a lucrative asset.
The potential sale of Racing Bulls is subject to conditions designed to ensure Red Bull’s long-term influence and profitability:
- An engine purchase agreement: The new owners would be required to continue purchasing Red Bull’s engines until the 2030 season, ensuring a steady revenue stream for Red Bull.
- Talent development: The buyer must agree to retain at least one driver from Red Bull’s junior programme until the end of 2030, supporting the development and exposure of emerging talent.
- Use of Facilities: Continued use of Red Bull’s wind tunnel facilities, for which the new owners would pay a fee, further cementing the technical partnership between the two companies.
These terms are designed to maintain a symbiotic relationship between Red Bull and Racing Bulls, regardless of ownership status.
Horner shuts down journalist over allegation
Steiner’s role and vision
Should Steiner’s consortium take over, his role is expected to be more strategic and less hands-on compared to his days at Haas. Possibly positioned at a director level, Steiner would bring his vast experience and notoriously tough management style to the fore and potentially steer the team towards greater competitive advantage.
Steiner’s return, coupled with Red Bull’s strategic sales plan, could send ripples through Formula One. It underlines the sport’s evolving landscape, where team ownership can have a significant impact on both sporting outcomes and team business models. For Red Bull, securing a high sale price for the Racing Bulls would demonstrate a shrewd understanding of timing and investment in sports management.
As the 2024 season approaches, all eyes will be on Red Bull and the Racing Bulls. Will Guenther Steiner make his F1 comeback? How will Red Bull’s investment improve the Racing Bulls’ performance and sales prospects? The answers to these questions will not only determine the future of the teams involved, but also highlight the intricate dance of strategy that defines F1 off the track.
READ MORE: F1 crisis: 2026 F1 cars “undrivable”
MORE F1 NEWS: Ocon split from Alpine, two teams linked to the Frenchman
The Renault Alpine factory team has been one of the most troubled teams of Formula 1 over the last few months. Things are not going well on the track and behind the scenes. Esteban Ocon has had enough and is reportedly considering a move on. Two teams have already been linked with the Frenchman.
Esteban Ocon’s current contract with Alpine expires at the end of the 2024 season. What happens next for the Frenchman is anyone’s guess. The current trend is clearly towards a farewell. The 27-year-old appears to have two possible destinations in mind…READ MORE ON THIS STORY
With over 30 years of experience in Formula 1 as an insider journalist, I have built trusted connections across the paddock, from race engineers and mechanics to senior team figures. At The Judge 13, I and a handful of trusted colleagues share exclusive Formula 1 news, expert analysis and behind-the-scenes stories you will not find in mainstream motorsport media.

What a biased article. Why is it whith him gone . HAAS stopped sliding and is now improving Veveraging the tech and skills it has had. He lost a power play when his approach sent the team down the standings. He is a good charismatic leader…but his approach failed
Where on earth did you hear this nonsense, “Judge”?
From what has been reported by respected, actual journalists, none of this makes any sense at all. Why would they sell when they have just brought them even closer into the fold, even going as far as transferring sections of team and personnel, into Milton Keynes? I get that Marko and Steiner are not exactly struggling, but I couldn’t imagine that they are anywhere NEAR wealthy enough to buy a whole team.
If you have read this or picked it up somewhere, I would question the source and their motive