Wolff bizarre comments suggest Mercedes in trouble

Lewis Hamilton’s luck finally ran out with the stewards at the 2023 Belgium Grand Prix. He had on three previous occasions over the been noted for driving related incidents by the race officials and in fact called before them to explain his actions after rejoining the circuit in a dangerous fashion at the top of Eau Rouge.

The fact it was Hamilton’s team mate who had to dodge the Mercedes returning to the track at the much discussed Radilon, in all probability helped Lewis’ cause given George Russell would have informed the stewards he didn’t feel ritafected his driving line in any way.

The seven times world champion finally lost his battle with the rules arbitrators during the Sprint race when he attempted a risky move to overtake Red Bull’s Sergio Perez.



Hamilton does “massive” damage to RB19

Hamilton attempted to pass the Mexican as they headed into Stavelot in the final third of the lap. The front left wheel of the Mercedes made contact with Checo’s sidepod forcing him to retire from the race.

The matter was noted by the race stewards and then Red Bull revealed over team radio the huge amount of damage Hamilton had caused. This was presumably relayed to the stewards.

“It was massive damage from the contact from Lewis,” a visibly disappointed Perez later revealed.

“He just took the whole right-hand side of the car. He damaged the floor and the side pod, so that was game over. We lost too much grip with it.



F1 driver urgency due to shortened  race

Due to a heavy shower just prior to the start of the Sprint, the drivers were ordered to circulate for several laps before a rolling start was ordered.

This meant the Sprint was reduced from fifteen laps to just eleven and Perez believes this affected Hamilton’s mentality.

“I think he was in a bit of a hurry. Everyone was in a hurry to recover today. It’s a very short race. So you have to take that level of risk, but not nice to get my race ruined by him.

“Basically he just ran out of grip and could not stop his car and just went into the side of me and damaged my floor. And that was very unfortunate.”

Piastri reacts to Red Bull move



Perez improved form

After a recent run of terrible form, Perez was challenging Alpine’s Pierre Gasly for third having started in eight position.

“It was looking great,” said Checo. “The team did a great strategy to recover. We were about to get Gasly just before this safety car came out. So yeah, it was looking great. But unfortunately, it was just all too late.”

Ricciardo reveals ‘frightening’ moment



Lewis Hamilton defiant

Lewis Hamilton unsurprisingly had his own view of the incident:

“[Perez] was pretty slow and went wide and slow through 14. I got a great exit, I was more than half a car alongside him and we just ended up coming together.

“It was a bit of a racing incident really, naturally it wasn’t intentional but they [the stewards] saw it differently.

“It was very tricky conditions out there, we were all trying our best. It doesn’t make a huge difference, fourth or seventh in the Sprint you don’t get a lot of points.”

Mercedes shaft Russell with amateur mistake



Red Bull let stewards know of “huge damage”

Of course the fact Hamilton ripped out the side of Perez’s RB19 who was passive through the entire incident , clearly didn’t register with Lewis’ when he expressed his view of the matter.

Initially Perez attempted to battle on but then the team informed him he had significant damage to his car and instructed him to retire. A short time later the stewards awarded Lewis a five second penalty for his ambitious move.

Hamilton was chasing down Pierre Gasly in the hope of claiming third in the Sprint, though his ageing tyres proved this was to be a bridge too far. Hamilton finished in P4 but was relegated three places at the chequered flag as his penalty applies.

Prost rages at “pathetic” Alpine



Toto Wolff snorts in defiance

After the race the Mercedes’ boss was clearly unimpressed with the decision made by the stewards.

“Absolute racing incident,” he snorted to Sky F1.

“This is a sprint race. We want to see them racing, and the argument of the damage isn’t valid because he [Perez] was going backward before then. Massively backward.”

Marko openly discusses Perez replacement



Mercedes arrogan and stubborn culture

Of course ramming another F1 car into a slower driver is no excuse however it is argued, yet the blindsided Toto persisted in his defence of his driver.

“I think when you look at that corner, they were side-by-side. And yeah, fair enough, it takes two to tango, but it’s a racing incident. For me, that’s pretty clear.”

Having claimed eight consecutive constructor titles, Mercedes have failed spectacularly to produce a competitive car since the big regulation changes in 2022.

Marko admits 3 teams facing cost cap sanctions



A hindrance to Mercedes recovery

The team’s stubborn insistence that their aerodynamic concept would come could has clearly hampered the Mercedes’ progression and even the recent ditching of the zero side pod design has led them with a hybrid version of their original design and that of the winning Red Bull team.

Wolff’s bizarre insistence that Hamilton did nothing wrong may well be driving the arrogant self justifying culture within the former F1 champions who appear to believe if they copy the world record breaking Red Bull car design they have in some way failed.

READ MORE: FIA “raid” teams HQ in “ruthless search” of rules breach evidence

4 responses to “Wolff bizarre comments suggest Mercedes in trouble

  1. Hamilton has a history of punting other drivers off to the outside instead of making a clean overtake, all without any substantial punitive consequences. Without doing research looking back a few years I seem to recall him punting Albon off the track in Brazil, Albon again in Austria, and I’ll never forget what he did to Verstappen at Silverstone putting him off at very high speed into the barriers for a 51g impact. What did he get for that one? A 10 second penalty, I think, and no points on his license. It’s about time the FIA starts holding him responsible for unsportsmanlike conduct and reckless endangerment. I think the much maligned stewards got this one right.

    • It is heartening to read Johnboy’s categorical implication that that Hamilton is one hell of a dirty driver. To make it worse, he continues to escape punishment, not to mention points on his licence. Stewards must be afraid to impose punishments on him because Hamilton would attack them “because I am black”.
      It is laughable that Hamilton considers himself as “the cleanest and fairest” driver EVER!!!

      I even feel that the Silverstone 2021 was hatched by Hamilton and Toto for a chance to eliminate the uncomfortable challenge of Verstappen in the full knowledge that the stewards are in their pockets. As long as he and Toto continue their arrogant defiance and unsporting culture, they are not going to win anything.

      Kudos to TJ13 for a truthful and balanced article.

  2. Several punishments have been given in the past, with the following reasoning: When on the inside you take the risk of understeering into your opponent. That is a punishable act so LH 5 seconds were perfectly justified and in line with previous incidents

  3. FIA is finally fed up with Lewis Hamilton’s entitled attitude.

    Benz Lives Matter always acts like the victim and ignore all the crap that Lewis Hamilton got away with in 2021. It was only when Michael Masi had enough of Toto and Lewis’ abuse that he finally gave Lewis what he deserved and said “you want the title? Fight Max 1v1 instead of having it handed to you.

    Lewis Hamilton Fans/Benz Lives Matter only like Lewis because he’s black and he promotes that Black Lives Matter garbage. Always attacking Fernando, Nicholas Latifi, and Max for just about everything. It’s insanely disgusting and those “””fans””” ruined Formula 1 with the constant worshipping of Lewis Hamilton.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.