During the Grand Prix weekend in Baku the FIA had made it clear to the teams that it does not allow them to preheat their hydraulic components of their chassis. Five teams are directly involved with such preheating activities, even when the cars are parked in the Parc Fermé. The Germans of Auto, motor und sport are reporting the next saga in the hydraulic suspension series.
According to AMUS Ferrari suspects Mercedes to have solved their tire troubles on an illegal way. Of course the engineers of the German team react differently. So how much of it is true? Well, there is the fact that the hydraulic suspension, as we knew it in 2016, has been forbidden earlier this year. But are there legal ways around these prohibited regulations?
The answer to that question seems to come from Mercedes. If you make a new system you just have to make it so complicated that the FIA stewards can not asses it in its totality. But Mercedes is only one of five teams who are under suspect. The other four are Red Bull Racing, Toro Rosso, Force India and McLaren. So how did they do it?
All of these five teams have one thing in common. All of them said goodbye to the classic shock absorbers and rear stabilizers. Instead they all went for a hydraulic actuators approach, with which they can control the ride height, the rolling behavior and any up or down movement the car makes. And, in order to hide them from the outside world, these actuators are placed inside the gearbox housing.
Samples have shown that all five of them used preheated oil in those actuators. They preheated them even when the cars where under strict Parc Fermé rules. By heating up the oil the teams are changing the characteristics of said oil, and with it the characteristics of the car. For instance, the teams were able to give their cars the ideal ground clearance before the start of the race.
Force India is one team that had preheated their hydraulic elements with hot air, in the garage. All this in order to get the oil at the temperatures it would eventually get while driving. Technician Andy Green doesn’t deny this: “Our goal was to keep the temperature of the hydraulic oil and therefore the ground clearance constant. With cold oil, the vehicle is lower than when it is hot. Because the oil warms up during driving, you have to calculate precisely how you can adjust the ground clearance while stationary, so that the desired ground clearance is achieved later, during the race.”
Under the Parc Fermé rules, between qualifying and the race, the car can not be technically altered, unless it involves repairs for safety reasons. And this can only be done after getting clearance by the FIA. The FIA has explained in Baku to all concerned teams that external preheating of chassis components is prohibited. By “external” they mean heating systems, which are connected to chassis components. As this would violate the Parce fermé rules. It is seen as a deliberate intervention in the chassis setup, like installing other dampers or stabilizers. After the Grand Prix the technicians were, once again, warned that preheating is no longer tolerated. Green groaned: “Without preheating, the drivers have to drive extremely fast during the laps to the starting grid so that the hydraulic oil heats up quickly. Only then can they feel if the balance of the car is where they want it.”
So has this put an end to all the trickery? Not quite…
There are loopholes at the moment that can not be forbidden. Mercedes has been suspected to have placed the hydraulic actuators so cleverly in their gearbox housing that they heat up almost “randomly”. It is assumed that oil ducts, containing oil from the gearbox, pass close besides or through the actuators. And thus would the heat radiation influence the viscosity of the hydraulic oil. Preheating would be easy that way because each team can make the gearbox shift as often and as long as they want, while the car sits in the garage. Hereby would the transmission oil and the surrounding environment be heated.
A FIA steward confirmed to AMUS that such a practice would not be punishable: “We can not prescribe anyone where he builds his suspension components and what is in their environment. Theoretically, one could also alienate an exhaust manifold for heating. We can only intervene when the warm-up happens in an unnatural way.”
Mercedes’ rivals became suspicious when the German team got their tire problems under control, and after Monte Carlo spoke of “new tools”, which should help with the handling of the tire rims. Since then the fluctuations between training and race and the individual tire types are far less than they were the races before. Anyone who can change the characteristics of the hydraulic dampers and stabilizers between training and racing in a clever way would always get the tires to work perfectly.
In the end there is only one way to close these loopholes: to outlaw hydraulic suspensions. But to get that kind of rule change, for 2018, there has to be a total unanimity. And we know how F1 teams are…
Interesting article. You could well argue that using thermal expansion, especially if they can vary the oil temperature, is a form of passive suspension, which is banned.
Interesting take on the subject. Wonder if the FIA thought of it?
I don’t know what the thermal characteristics of gearbox oil are, but if you could use oil directly form the oil cooler some of the time, and oil coming directly out of the gearbox some of the time to feed the hydraulic actuators , there would be a temperature difference and hence different rates of thermal expansion, which could be used to alter ride height during a race. And that is passive / adaptive suspension – which is clearly banned.
I love engineering around rules like this. Makes me proud to love this sport.
Well, some calls engineering around rules for, cheating.
No. Breaking rules is cheating.
F1 is a technical sport for the engineers as well. The formula is laid out ahead of time and interpreted differently by everyone that reads them. Some elements are easily black and white while others can be shades of grey.
So, let me get this straight….
Fia can do nothing against pre-heating which is using other car elements like the exhaust or gearbox in very complicated and expensive ways.
But they ban cheap heating with a hot air blower?
Wait, this is F1, where everyone has to save costs but you ban all cheap and totally developed systems but allow for complicated expensive trickery which does the same as a simple cheap system, just because the rulebook is written by a monkey.
Rules are rules, I guess 😂
As Sash says above this post. FIA wants to ban the hot air blower and force teams to invest tens or even hundreds of thousands to develop new gearboxes with integrated suspension actuators and heating systems.
FIA should understand that teams can not UNlearn the knowhow they have got. You can not expect teams to revert to leaf springs and friction dampers.
After Mercedes took years to develop their FRIC system and found it banned shortly after, on the basics of that knowhow they developed a FRiC without an I (interconnected). Now that this system has been banned this winter, that same know how is again applied on the current day suspension systems.
This winter teams addressed this issue and suggested the solution could be for all teams to use a (spec) active suspension system. Highly adaptable yet less complex and far less expensive than the current systems. Haven’t heard from it for months.
But until than, lets ban the hot air blower !!!
Wouldn’t it make sense to allow the adaptive suspensions? I mean, what kind of high perf car cannot make use of modern suspensions? Wouldn’t it be best to actually allow such suspensions, and regulate them instead of having the teams spending millions of dollars to work around the rules and develop something fundamentally useless anywhere else?
I think the logic for banning it was the fear that the cars could go too fast through corners and track safety measures would need major changes if left unchecked.
The FIA likes to say they are worried about high costs but It seems they allow teams to expend millions developing whatever they want… as long as it doesn’t work !
But the moment it works…
Would it not be easy to spot if a team uses oil from the gearbox for these purposes?