The next generation F1 engine takes shape along with simpler aero

V6 biturbo, standard KERS, many standard parts and the abandonment of all-wheel drive are going to be the basis of the next Formula One Power Unit coming in 2020, a year earlier than planned.

Although the decision has been made, the actual deadline for the decision comes on the 31st December this year, until that time the FIA, the owners of F1 and the manufacturers/teams want to establish the foundation of the engine sooner rather than later. A wholesale abandonment of high technology and a return to simpler engines seems to be the direction of which the sport is heading along with the zero chance of the rumoured 4 wheel drive.

The 1.6 V6 engine remains in place with the efficiency driven pre-chamber combustion technologies developed over the last year or two. Twin turbos will be added on with a single KERS unit driving the rear wheels only. Previously, a thought to power the front wheels with electrical motors in a similar vein to the WEC LMP1 category was mooted, this has now been deemed as heavy and cumbersome.

“We want to get weight out of the cars. An all-wheel drive would make the cars even heavier ” a member of the engine committee commented. The goal of reducing weight also limits the size and power of the battery. The electric power will therefore be in a maximum range of 150 to 200 bhp in addition to the V6.

A major concern is the Formula 1’s new owner is to reduce the complexity and cost . Independent engine manufacturers such as Ilmor, Cosworth or AER should also be able to build the new Power Unit at a reasonable development cost. For this, the largest cost drivers will be standardised – the battery, the electric motor and the turbocharger will all be outsourced and specced.

The tenders for the the standardised parts will be made public this year through the FIA. The plan is to prepare the teams at an early stage and give them enough development time after a choice has been made. The winning tender will be the one who can offer the best efficiency at the lowest price. In areas where technology is rapidly advancing, there will be calls for tenders in shorter periods to keep Formula 1 at the cutting edge of technology. Depending on the standardised part, the supply contract can be between two and five years.

The Concorde Agreement allows a change of engine regulations until 2021. Liberty Media, however, is determined to advanced the date by one year. The four engine manufacturers of the Formula 1 are also keen to have the new package early in 2020 as they save a year’s worth of extra development costs for the current engines. It is their belief that 2020 would also be a feasible date for new entrants such as new car manufacturers or even independents like Cosworth to get involved.

Aerodynamics and chassis are also set to be simplified. Before the summer break, representatives of the FIA, Ross Brawn and the teams will assemble to discuss the rules for 2019. Brawn is pushing for this early decision so they won’t end up making last minute bad decisions, something F1 fans are all too familiar with in the past.

“We have time to think about the car by April 2018. We should make good use of this time and not make a snap decision but a well-founded technical package. ” said Brawn on the 2019 rules.

Could we see a return to underbody aerodynamics? A simplification of over body aero could open the possibilities up for the supposed ‘clean’ downforce generated by Venturi tunnels first developed and subsequently banned in the late seventies and early eighties. It is argued that such downforce generation could enable cars to follow one another easier, thus enabling overtaking without gimmicks such as DRS. As a self confessed hater of DRS and other artificial concepts, surely this is an area that Brawn will consider for the future cars.

12 responses to “The next generation F1 engine takes shape along with simpler aero

  1. Sounds good. Now allow the enigines to rev at least 4,000 rpm higher, and you’ll get a nice sound. It doesn’t need to be the ear shattering loudness of the old days, but let’s get a nice, mean whine back.

    • The current engines are in fact allowed to spin up to 15,000 RPM. The FIA however made it pointless to do so by capping the fuel-flow rate at 10,500RPM.

      • Agreed!
        The extra ICE power should come from increased fuelflow. FIA should free up this higher fuelflow at higher rpm’s…

  2. “Could we see a return to underbody aerodynamics?”

    There’s a good reason under-body aerodynamics, better known as ground effects, were banned – they’re lethal.

    • They were lethal in the early 80’s when cars and tracks were not as safe as they are now.
      And do not make the mistake in thinking that the 2017 F1 cars have less downforce than the early 80’s cars.

      • It has nothing to do with the amount of downforce created – but by the way the downforce is created.

  3. So, the FIA .by allowing thr new trick combustion techniques to continue hope that this will be enought incentive to keep the current manufacturers interested. I suspect that Mercedes, Renault and Ferrari will not like this very much but it it enough to make any of them leave?

    • There is an Engine working group where the current engine manufacturers are represented, together with manufacturers like Alfa Romeo, VAG (Porsche) and independents like Cosworth and Ilmor.
      Manufacturers know what is coming, they’re part of it. There only seems some discussion about the number of standard parts…

  4. Pingback: F1 2021: Liberty's 4WD, Porsche & Spec PU's | Biggest reason it will fail·

  5. Pingback: Spanish Grand Prix | Alonso "It's getting stressful", McLaren Radical nose·

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.