Red Bull CEO addresses rift between Marko and Horner – Red Bull CEO Oliver Mintzlaff has publicly addressed the growing tension surrounding the departures of two of the team’s most influential figures: Dr Helmut Marko and former team principal Christian Horner. Although Mintzlaff stated that he does not wish to exacerbate the dispute, he distanced himself firmly from the comments made by Marko after he left the Formula 1 team.

Shortly after announcing his departure, Marko criticised Horner, accusing him of engaging in ‘dirty games’ and suggesting that Red Bull had changed significantly in recent years. These remarks have added another layer of intrigue to an already tumultuous period of transition for the Milton Keynes-based outfit, which has undergone major leadership changes after two decades of remarkable stability.

 

 

 

Mintzlaff Responds to Marko’s Accusations

In an interview with De Telegraaf, Mintzlaff addressed Marko’s claims directly, though he avoided personal attacks. When asked about the Austrian’s statements and his suggestion that ‘a lot has changed’ within Red Bull, the CEO made it clear where he stands.

“The words about Christian are Helmut’s,” Mintzlaff said. ‘I can’t say anything negative about Christian. Quite simply, he meant a great deal to Red Bull.”

He acknowledged that difficult decisions sometimes have to be made at the highest level, even when an individual has achieved enormous success. According to him, Red Bull had reached a point where it needed to assess whether continuing in the same direction was still the right option.

‘There always comes a moment when things aren’t going well,’ he explained. ‘Then, as a company, you have to decide: do you give someone more time, or is it time for a new boss? We felt it was time for a change.”

F1 Global Boom Explained: Why F1 Is Attracting More Fans Than Ever in 2025

 

Mintzlaff: “I do not agree with Helmut’s statements.”

While Mintzlaff sought to keep emotions out of the discussion, he was unequivocal in rejecting Marko’s narrative.

‘I do not agree with Helmut’s statements,’ he said. ‘Yes, it is logical that things change in an organisation. Perhaps Dr Marko has also changed over the years.’

The Red Bull CEO emphasised that evolution is inevitable in any long-running organisation, particularly one competing at the highest level of global sport. Expecting everything to remain exactly as it was several years ago is neither realistic nor healthy, he argued.

‘I think it’s perfectly normal that not everything is the same as it was five years ago,’ Mintzlaff continued. ‘Christian and Helmut worked together excellently from the beginning in 2005. That’s more than twenty years of cooperation.’

Verstappen stands by his criticism of Norris: “I clearly suffered from that.”

 

A Unique Partnership in Modern Sport

Mintzlaff also urged observers to view the situation from a broader perspective. Instead of focusing on the fact that both Horner and Marko have now left their roles, he emphasised how unusual it is for a leadership partnership to remain intact for such a long time in modern sport.

‘It’s unusual in such a large sports organisation for a leadership duo to stay together for that length of time,’ he said. ‘You can look at it negatively and say that they’re both gone now. But I would rather say it’s unique that they worked together for so long and achieved so much.’

Under Horner and Marko, Red Bull evolved from a midfield team into a dominant force, winning multiple world championships and redefining the way Formula 1 teams are run. Mintzlaff’s comments suggest that the company remains deeply appreciative of that legacy, even as it moves forward.

Verstappen’s manager has heard “good things” about Red Bull’s 2026 engine

 

Horner’s Exit and a New Direction

Red Bull officially parted ways with Christian Horner last summer, bringing an end to his long tenure as team principal. Laurent Mekies was appointed as his successor and was tasked with steering the team through a new era amid changing regulations and increased competition.

Under Mekies’ leadership, Red Bull has experienced a notable resurgence. Max Verstappen made a remarkable comeback in the latter part of the season, just missing out on what would have been his fifth world championship title. This performance was early validation that the team’s structural changes had not undermined its competitive edge.

Vasseur’s new claims at the Ferrari festive bash

 

Mintzlaff: “It was time to turn over a new leaf.”

Mintzlaff stressed that the decision to part ways with Horner was not taken lightly and had the full backing of Red Bull’s leadership.

“We were one hundred percent behind this measure,” he said. ‘Because we knew we had to do something.’

At the same time, he rejected any suggestion that the move reflected a ruthless management style. ‘I am not a hire-and-fire manager,’ Mintzlaff explained. ‘Christian has a great track record with the team and has achieved many successes. Everyone here, myself included, appreciates him for what he has accomplished.”

However, the CEO made it clear that past achievements alone could not dictate the future direction of the organisation. Red Bull, he said, did not want to rely solely on its history.

‘We didn’t want to rest on our laurels,’ Mintzlaff concluded. ‘We felt it was time to start a new chapter. It wasn’t an easy decision, and we didn’t rush into it, but sometimes change is necessary.’

Red Bull’s Achilles heel remains despite positive soundings over 2026 power unit

 

NEXT ARTICLE – F1 row erupting over 2026 regulation loophole

There was Williams active suspension in the 1990’s, Renault’s electronic gismos in the mid naughties, the double diffuser of the Brawn car and off throttle blowing by Red Bull and Renault. All loopholes in the regulation which a single team managed to exploit to win championships.

Now with the biggest set of technical regulations coming in the history of F1, another loophole is likely to cause a paddock row and a potential protest from certain teams come the season opener in Australia.

The grey area some manufacturers of the powertrains are seeking to exploit is over the new compression ratios for the internal combustion engine specified by the FIA.

 

Maximum compression rate for ICE reduced for 2026

Whilst no formal complaint has yet been made, the finger of suspicion has fallen upon Mercedes – who supply McLaren, Williams and Alpine together with Red Bull powertrains who supply the Racing Bulls and Red bull Racing.

The beef surrounds Article C5.4.3 of the new technical regulations which mandates a reduction in compression rates from 18.0:1 to 16.0;1. The reason behind this was to temper peak performance and deliver more efficient combustion in lines with the sport’s ever increasing green values, but it appears to have created a new complex battle between the manufacturers.

The loophole has been created by the FIA’s decision on how to measure the new ratio. Under the current rules this will…READ MORE ON THIS STORY