Lando Norris left the Autodromo Nazionale di Monza with more than just another podium finish under his belt. He also left with a fresh grievance with Formula One’s race stewards, and with Max Verstappen, too — not for the first time. The opening metres of the Italian Grand Prix on 7 September 2025 provided enough drama to fuel McLaren’s debrief for several days and enough colourful radio chatter to remind everyone that Norris is not afraid to speak his mind.
The McLaren driver had lined up alongside Verstappen on the front row, angling his car optimistically towards the first chicane. He got off to a sharp start, momentarily nosing ahead of the reigning champion. However, Verstappen, as he has done countless times before, closed the door with an uncompromising shove that left Norris scrabbling across the Monza grass. “What’s that idiot doing? He pushed me into the grass!’ was Norris’s immediate reaction over the team radio, his words providing a raw soundtrack to the early skirmish. For all the smiles off the track, when he has his helmet on, Norris is no stranger to bluntly assessing his peers.
After the race, he remained unconvinced. When asked whether Verstappen had left him enough space at the start, he offered a dry retort: ‘Well, all four wheels were off the track, so I’ll take that as a no. But I also expect that to some extent. I expect a tough defence on the limit.” He added, however, “I don’t think you can just push people into the dirt. He knew from the outset that I was beside him. I had the better launch, and he knew that too.” It was the classic Verstappen–Norris paradox: mutual respect laced with simmering frustration.
How Lando Norris saved Piastri’s podium
Turn 1 chaos and Red Bull pragmatism
Norris chose not to slow down, and the pair sped into Turn 1, with the McLaren edging inside. Verstappen, unwilling to yield, drove straight through the chicane, predictably angering Norris. ‘He has to give back the position; that’s clear. He would never have made the turn,’ came the McLaren driver’s insistent message. Verstappen’s own radio carried an equally firm defence: “He released the brake.” The paddock has grown accustomed to these conflicting interpretations of events, but Red Bull’s Gianpiero Lambiase was in no mood to invite a penalty. When Verstappen asked whether he should give up his place, his engineer’s reply was unambiguous. Moments later, Verstappen slowed to allow Norris to pass, albeit accompanied by a stream of expletives about “bullshit” racing rules.
While the Dutchman’s grumble may have found sympathy among old-school fans who remember Monza’s first chicane as a scene of guaranteed elbows-out chaos, it also exposed a curious irony: Verstappen, usually so uncompromising, was persuaded to show restraint by Red Bull’s caution. Norris enjoyed a brief moment in the spotlight, leading the tifosi on lap two, before Verstappen returned the favour by overtaking him at the start of lap four. The McLaren driver admitted afterwards that his rival’s pace was irresistible. ‘It was nice to be in the lead for a few laps, but that didn’t last long. Max’s pace was simply too good for us today, especially in the first stint.”
The unequal duel
The contest was brief but fierce, and it left Norris pondering his own title fight with Oscar Piastri. “Verstappen can afford to take much more risks and drive more aggressively than I can,” said Norris. ‘I can’t afford to lose a front wing or sustain even the slightest damage. I felt I took the necessary risks and did my part, but I just wasn’t fast enough.’ The blunt reality of modern Formula 1 is that some drivers, free from championship calculations, can push with impunity, while others must weigh up the value of their constructors’ points against every gamble.
When asked whether Verstappen’s initial defence had been fair, Norris simply shrugged. ‘Ultimately, it’s not my decision.’ It was the kind of answer that spoke volumes. For all his frustration, Norris knows the FIA’s stewards will never rewrite the laws of wheel-to-wheel combat for his benefit. Verstappen’s manoeuvre will be filed away in the archives alongside Spielberg 2024, Austin and Mexico, and all the other flashpoints where these two modern gladiators have come into contact.
“Not bad for a No. 2”: Piastri told to move over in Monza
The theatre of Monza
While the first three laps offered a microcosm of the rivalry between Norris and Verstappen, the rest of the race unfolded in a more predictable fashion. Verstappen pulled away, leaving McLaren to consolidate. Norris later admitted that he relished the intensity, even if the scoreboard did not favour him. “That’s probably what I enjoy most: battles like that,” he explained. “But you can’t just force people off the track.” Monza, with its long straights and unforgiving run-offs, has always encouraged aggressive defence, and Verstappen’s uncompromising attitude was in keeping with this.
From the outside, the duel could be seen as harmless theatre. Norris took the lead for a moment, Verstappen reasserted his dominance, and the stewards were spared the need for a full investigation thanks to Red Bull’s timely concession. Yet the radio outbursts revealed something deeper. Both drivers feel that the current rulebook forces them to make unnatural compromises, favouring not the bravest driver, but the one most willing to play a legal chess game at 200 miles per hour. Verstappen, never one for diplomacy, put it bluntly: ‘These racing rules are fucking bullshit.’
The truth is that the opening sprint at Monza to Turn 1 has always been a magnet for controversy. No amount of regulations or track redesigns can stop two drivers, driven by pride and ego and with the World Championship in mind, from trying to outmuscle each other. Norris was genuinely frustrated, but Verstappen was also right in saying that he had done nothing beyond the established script. While the FIA may wish to codify every nuance of wheel placement, this duel showed that Formula One’s essence lies in the grey areas.
The Norris–Verstappen relationship
Beyond the theatrics, their relationship continues to fascinate. Off the track, they are often playful, exchanging jokes at press conferences and spending their downtime together. On track, however, the gloves are off. Norris admits he respects Verstappen’s ability, yet he is frustrated by what he perceives as a double standard. Meanwhile, Verstappen appears to relish having another challenger who refuses to yield easily. Their sometimes bitter, sometimes light-hearted exchanges form one of the sport’s defining storylines. In Italy, the rivalry added another chapter, and the jury won’t have to wait long for the next instalment.
The Monza duel was brief, spectacular and ultimately inconsequential for the championship. However, it raised questions about fairness, racing etiquette, and the balance between a hard defence and forcing a rival off the track. Was Verstappen simply doing what any champion must do, or was Norris right to feel aggrieved? More importantly, do the rules actually encourage clarity, or do they merely cause confusion and frustration for drivers and fans alike? As always, the jury is invited to deliver its verdict.
MORE F1 NEWS – Vertsappen hails Mekies Red Bull changes
It seems Christian Horner is again to be made the scapegoat for Red Bull’s lack of performance this year and last. Having been sacked from the Red Bull Formula One team Laurent Mekies was brought in as a replacement for the longest standing F1 team boss.
Red Bull are suffering their worst season since 2015 when their ‘put-put’ Renault engine repeatedly failed to make the 300km distance on Sundays. Yet the power unit has not been the problem at Red Bull but the car design which has been extremely difficult to drive.
Seemingly only Max Verstappen can cope with the RB21 given he has scored 230 of the teams tally of 239 this season so far. The race weekend in Monza kind of proved this again, as Verstappen was dominant finishing almost 20 second ahead of the supreme McLaren’s. Meanwhile Yuki Tsunoda trailed home for a couple of points in a distant ninth position…READ MORE ON THIS STORY
Craig.J. Alderson is Senior Editor at TJ13, where Craig oversees newsroom operations and coordinates editorial output across the site. With a background in online sports reporting and motorsport magazine editing, he plays a key role in maintaining consistency, speed, and accuracy in TJ13’s coverage.
During race weekends, Craig acts as desk lead, directing contributors, prioritising breaking stories, and ensuring timely publication across a fast-moving news cycle.
Craig’s work focuses heavily on real-time developments in the paddock, including team updates, regulatory decisions, and emerging controversies. This role requires a detailed understanding of Formula 1’s operational flow, from practice sessions through to race-day strategy and post-race fallout.
With experience managing editorial teams, Craig ensures that TJ13 delivers structured, reliable coverage while maintaining the site’s distinctive voice.
Craig has a particular interest in how information moves within the paddock environment, and how rapidly developing stories can be accurately translated into clear, accessible reporting for readers.
With over 30 years of experience in Formula 1 as an insider journalist, I have built trusted connections across the paddock, from race engineers and mechanics to senior team figures. At The Judge 13, I and a handful of trusted colleagues share exclusive Formula 1 news, expert analysis and behind-the-scenes stories you will not find in mainstream motorsport media.
Verstappen is one helluva driver, but his uncompromising style will sooner or later cause a nasty crash. The way he pushed Norris off was reminiscent of the worst moves we’ve seen from Senna and Schumacher in the past.
I think MV was in the right. LN may feel it is unfair because he is fighting for the championship – but MV knows what THAT feels like, but is still gladiatorial. It’s what puts him far and away above others, to my mind!
Stewards remain unpredictable and that is regrettable
LN is whiner, its always everyone elses fault.S uck it up buttercup, grow up and be a man.