Last Updated on November 22 2024, 11:13 pm
Vasseur stresses focus on World Championship amid skid-block rule changes as FIA closes skid-block loophole ahead of Las Vegas GP – In a decisive move to level the playing field, the FIA has closed a controversial loophole in the Formula One regulations regarding skid blocks on the underbody of the cars.
The new technical directive, issued just days before the Las Vegas Grand Prix, requires teams to revise their set-ups to comply with the clarified guidelines.While the change was not universally welcomed, the teams are now adapting to the changes as they prepare for the race weekend.

At a press conference with Ferrari’s Fred Vasseur, Mercedes’ Toto Wolff and Alpine’s Oliver Oakes, all three team principals confirmed that their mechanics had made changes to comply with the directive. Although the rule change has been controversial, most teams have accepted the FIA’s decision as part of the sport’s regulatory evolution.
Breaking: Verstappen reveals new plans
Red Bull self-reporting amid fears of protests
Interestingly, Red Bull played a key role in prompting the FIA’s intervention.The reigning Constructors’ Champions essentially self-reported the potential ambiguity in the rules, seeking clarification to avoid future disputes. Their concern stemmed from the fear that McLaren, a team that had not used the additional skid-block solution, might lodge a protest.Such a protest could have resulted in the disqualification of cars from several teams for improper use of skid-blocks.
As it turned out, McLaren had no intention of protesting. The team, unaware of the loophole, had strictly adhered to the original interpretation of the rules and avoided the use of additional skid blocks altogether. This revelation defused the tension, but highlighted the inconsistency in how teams interpreted and applied the rules.
Perez longevity at Red Bull to continue
Ferrari’s frustration over timing and implementation
While Red Bull’s proactive stance prevented potential protests, Ferrari expressed dissatisfaction with the timing of the directive. “Six days’ notice was extremely short,” complained Ferrari team principal Fred Vasseur.Although the aerodynamic flexibility of the SF-24 car allowed it to cope with a slight increase in ride height, Ferrari was faced with a more technical problem: excessive wear on the unprotected mounting bolts when the car bottomed out. This could potentially violate the FIA’s strict millimetre rule for floor wear.
With little time to gather reliable data or carry out meaningful testing during free practice, Ferrari were left scrambling to adjust their set-up.This frustration was compounded by Ferrari’s belief that their previous configuration had already been approved by the FIA.In fact, reports from *F1.uno* confirmed that Ferrari had received explicit written approval for their previous skid-block implementation, which only added to their disappointment at the last-minute rule change.
Despite this frustration, Vasseur ultimately decided against challenging the directive. While Ferrari briefly considered sticking with their original design in the belief that written FIA approval would protect them from disqualification, Vasseur opted to prioritise the team’s wider goals.”We’re better off concentrating on ourselves,” he remarked. “The FIA has enough problems as it is.”
Vegas hype over rated as F1 insider reveals Verstappen’s new team mate
Teams forced to adapt to sudden changes
The directive affected eight teams in total:Red Bull, Ferrari, Mercedes, Aston Martin, Haas, Sauber, Alpine and VCARB.Each had to revise their skid-block configurations to comply with the updated regulations. Ferrari and Mercedes made notable efforts to minimise disruption, while Red Bull’s proactive communication helped ensure a smoother transition for them and their competitors.
For Ferrari, the main concern was not only to comply with the new rules, but also to ensure that the SF-24 could perform at its best without risking excessive wear.The challenge was particularly daunting given the tight timeframe, with engineers working with limited data gathered during practice sessions.
Norris dismissed Red Bull as title challengers
Mercedes takes action
Mercedes Team Principal Toto Wolff shared his insights into the wider implications of the rule change. “A lot of teams had technologies where this skid block, this titanium plate, moved and basically slid into the ground, making them legal when they wouldn’t have been otherwise,” Wolff explained. Mercedes, like Ferrari, have had to adapt their design but appear to have weathered the change without major setbacks.
“We will know more tomorrow in qualifying and in the race,” said Wolff.”If you’ve actually played with it [the skid-block loophole], you have to set the car much higher to get through the race legally.”
Russell ups the ante in FIA dispute
Red Bull and McLaren: contrasting approaches.
Red Bull’s proactive approach to the skid block issue stands in stark contrast to McLaren’s conservative strategy. While Red Bull sought to clarify the ambiguity, McLaren simply avoided exploiting the loophole from the outset. This divergence underlines the complexity of navigating Formula One’s regulatory landscape, where innovation often pushes the boundaries of legality.
By self-reporting and engaging the FIA in discussions, Red Bull sought to ensure that the championship battle remained focused on the track rather than in the stewards’ room.However, their actions also inadvertently revealed the extent to which other teams were exploiting the loophole, prompting a swift response from the FIA.
Hamilton ‘speechless’ of Mercedes
The road ahead: Focus shifts back to racing
The immediate impact of the skid-block rule is likely to be felt at the Las Vegas Grand Prix, although experts believe that the real impact will be felt in Qatar. With its high downforce sections and sensitive aerodynamic requirements, the Qatar circuit could expose any weaknesses in the updated set-ups.
In Las Vegas, the bumps and undulations of the street circuit are expected to mitigate the impact of the rule change. However, the teams remain cautious, building in extra safety margins to avoid possible disqualifications for excessive tyre wear.

For Vasseur and Ferrari, the focus is clear: the fight for the championship takes precedence over technical disputes.While the team may feel aggrieved by the timing and implementation of the directive, their decision to comply reflects a wider commitment to maintaining the integrity of the sport.
As the paddock settles into the new regulatory framework, the skid-block controversy serves as a reminder of the fine line between innovation and compliance in Formula One.
Whether these changes will have a lasting impact on the championship or fade into the background will depend on how the next few races unfold. For now, the spotlight remains on Las Vegas, where teams must adapt and perform under the bright lights of the Strip.
READ MORE – Brand new works team approved by F1
MORE F1 NEWS – Breaking: Verstappen reveals new plans
Verstappen reflects on fourth title and his new plans in an exclusive interview with the German media – Max Verstappen, the reigning Formula One champion, is on the verge of clinching a fourth consecutive world title. The Dutchman, known for his relentless drive and exceptional skill, is heading to the Las Vegas Grand Prix where he could clinch the title with another stellar performance.
In an exclusive interview with the German media RTL/ntv and sport.de, Verstappen discussed his journey, the significance of a fourth championship and what lies ahead in his career with his future planning…READ MORE ON THIS STORY
With over 30 years of experience in Formula 1 as an insider journalist, I have built trusted connections across the paddock, from race engineers and mechanics to senior team figures. At The Judge 13, I and a handful of trusted colleagues share exclusive Formula 1 news, expert analysis and behind-the-scenes stories you will not find in mainstream motorsport media.
