“Attempt at psychological warfare” says McLaren Team Principal Andrea Stella, who has made some serious accusations against his team’s rivals, suggesting that the recent controversies surrounding McLaren’s flexible rear wing amount to an attempt at psychological warfare.
Stella’s frustration stems not only from the accusations themselves, but also from the way the issue has been handled by the media, with certain articles seemingly serving as a platform for McLaren’s rivals to air their grievances.
Marko finally backs Tsunoda for RBR 2025 drive
The Controversy: McLaren’s resurgence under scrutiny
McLaren have undergone a remarkable turnaround over the past year and a half, transforming themselves from a team struggling at the back of the grid to one fighting at the very top of the Constructors’ Championship. The resurgence has been nothing short of impressive, marked by several podiums and race wins. In particular, both drivers – Oscar Piastri and Lando Norris – have helped to fill McLaren’s trophy cabinet with consistent top finishes. However, the team’s success has not been without controversy.
Following Piastri’s victory at the Azerbaijan Grand Prix, McLaren’s rivals pointed to video footage which suggested that the McLaren car’s rear wing showed unusual flexibility.
This led to suspicions that the team was gaining an advantage by using what was essentially a “mini-DRS”, a system that reduces drag to increase straight-line speed, in contravention of the rules. The allegations resulted in McLaren having to make adjustments to the car, first in Singapore and then again in the United States.
Despite these changes, the team maintains that its car has always been compliant.
McLaren team order to Piastri not broadcast
Competitor complaints through media channels
According to Stella, what made the situation particularly frustrating was not just the allegations themselves, but the way they were spread through the media. Speaking to *Motorsport.com*, Stella insisted that McLaren’s rear wing had passed all the required flexibility tests and was compliant with the FIA’s technical regulations.
“Our wings were compliant with the technical regulations and passed all the flexibility checks,” said Stella.
“In addition, we had discussions with the International Federation at the time and received the necessary reassurance.”
Despite this, rivals appeared to have taken their grievances directly to the media, rather than following internal FIA procedures.
Stella remarked: “We obviously read a lot of comments in the media, opinions that came mainly from our competitors and not from journalists.And certain articles seemed to be a medium to spread the voice of some of our competitors on the track”.
Horner cites “several reasons” for RBR turnaround
Allegations of rule-breaking: Media pressure or fair play?
The Italian team principal’s displeasure with the media strategy of McLaren’s rivals is clear.
He suggests that some teams are using public platforms to stir up controversy in the hope of destabilising McLaren’s progress.
“I have seen articles that I believe were used by other teams as a means of putting McLaren in a bad light,” Stella said.
This, he argues, has put McLaren in an unfair position. By publicly discussing technical issues, the rival teams were essentially trying to sway public opinion before the FIA had even had a chance to investigate or confirm the legitimacy of the complaints.
“The technical aspects have been discussed with the FIA. They are doing the checks,” he said, reaffirming McLaren’s compliance with the regulations.
The suggestion that teams are using the media to manipulate public perception paints a picture of F1 as not just a battle on the track, but a battle off it – a battle for influence and control of the narrative.
Psychological warfare: Stella’s frustration
Perhaps the most striking element of Stella’s comments is his claim that McLaren’s rivals are waging psychological warfare. According to the McLaren boss, the media storm surrounding the flexible rear wing was designed to distract his team and weaken their competitive resolve.
“It’s an attempt at psychological warfare to weaken the competition,” said Stella.
“But from our point of view the facts were very clear.”
The Italian’s use of the term “psychological warfare” suggests that he believes these public accusations were not just a matter of rivals raising legitimate concerns, but part of a wider strategy to undermine McLaren’s momentum at a crucial stage of the season.
The impact on McLaren’s team dynamics
Despite the allegations and the media frenzy, Stella insists that the situation ultimately had a galvanising effect on his team.Rather than being destabilised, McLaren has emerged stronger from the controversy.
“Ultimately, this story has made us even stronger as a team,” he said.“Because if the competition is so distracted by our technical solutions, then I can conclude that they bring us good news.”
Stella’s confidence in the team’s resilience is palpable. For him, the fact that McLaren’s rivals are so focused on the team’s technical innovations suggests that they are losing focus on their own performance.
“It means they have lost their direction a little bit,” he concluded.
Hamilton refusing to run Mercedes upgrades
A longstanding tactic in F1?
Psychological warfare in F1 is not a new phenomenon. Teams and drivers have long used the media and public statements to get inside the heads of their rivals.
Whether it’s Sebastian Vettel accusing Lewis Hamilton of unsportsmanlike behaviour or teams questioning each other’s technical innovations, F1 has often been as much about managing pressure as it has been about racing.
For McLaren, a team that has historically been at the forefront of F1 innovation, accusations from rivals are nothing new. The team’s early dominance with innovations such as the carbon-fibre monocoque, as well as their success in the turbo and hybrid era, has often led to competitors scrutinising their cars for potential rule-breaking. In this case, however, Stella believes the line has been crossed, with the media being used as pawns in a wider game of mental manipulation.
McLaren’s shocking gamble: Will Team Harmony Cost Lando Norris the Championship?
What’s next for McLaren?
As the season progresses, McLaren will undoubtedly face continued scrutiny from both the FIA and their rivals. With several races to go and the Constructors’ Championship still in play, the team will need to focus on performance rather than external distractions.
For Stella, the main takeaway from the rear wing controversy is that McLaren’s rivals see the British team as a real threat.
But even if McLaren continues to insist that its car is legal and within the rules, the accusations from its rivals may not die down. As long as the team continues to perform at a high level, and as long as the competition feels threatened by their resurgence, controversies such as this could remain a feature of McLaren’s season.
Brown demands “consequences” for RBR: “In the past you were disqualified”
A battle beyond the track
The controversy surrounding McLaren’s flexible rear wing has highlighted a broader aspect of Formula One: the importance of managing not only what happens on the track, but also how teams deal with the pressures off it. Andrea Stella’s comments about psychological warfare underline the high-stakes environment in which F1 teams operate, where mind games and public perception can be as important as lap times and pit strategies.
For McLaren, the challenge now is to keep the focus on the race and ensure they can continue their remarkable comeback while fending off challenges both on and off the track.
For the rest of the paddock, the message is clear: McLaren is back and they’re ready to fight on all fronts.
READ MORE – McLaren’s shocking gamble: Will Team Harmony Cost Lando Norris the Championship?
MORE F1 NEWS – Marko confirms Perez exit
In the world of Formula One, little stands still which is evidenced perfectly by the in season development of the cars which often adds a second or more of lap time across twenty four rounds of competition. One thing however is certain in that drivers are consistently monitored by their performance against their team mates who are in effect driving through same car.
Sergio Perez has been the talk of the paddock for the best part of two seasons in part for this very reason. Last year’s summer slump from the Mexican threatened to derail Red Bull’s first 1-2 in the drivers championship but in the end Checo pulled through and bought himself another year alongside Max.
However, this year has been an utter nightmare for Sergio who has finished behind his team mate in all nineteen Grand Prix weekends bar Australia where Verstappen was forced to retire due to technical failure…READ MORE ON THIS STORY
With over 30 years of experience in Formula 1 as an insider journalist, I have built trusted connections across the paddock, from race engineers and mechanics to senior team figures. At The Judge 13, I and a handful of trusted colleagues share exclusive Formula 1 news, expert analysis and behind-the-scenes stories you will not find in mainstream motorsport media.
Mr. Brown is doing the very same! So, it’s OK when your team is doing it but others shouldn’t!?
You’re right, there wasn’t anything nearly as nasty as this before Brown became TP.
Absolutely, Peter! Brown keeps ON and ON even though the FIA have said there is no problem – but woe-betied anyone that dares criticise THEIR cars, even though we could all see that flexing!!
And MV is right – the British media are SO biased towards Brits, it’s embarrassing (and I am a Brit!).
The penalty for Norris WAS consistent – particularly lenient actually, so maybe f they lodge their complaint the FULL penalty (in line with the rules!) should then be applied.