Red Bull Racing kicked off the Formula One season with a remarkable one-two finish in Bahrain, with Sergio Pérez and world champion Max Verstappen leading the way. However, the triumph on the track was overshadowed by the ongoing controversy surrounding team principal Christian Horner.
No one can blame the Red Bull team principal for refusing to give any information or opinion on the matter as he struggles to fight back against the tidal wave of negative content that has been published with the sole purpose of destroying his reputation and forcing his employer to take action. However, tensions escalated when Jos Verstappen, Max’s father, publicly called for action to be taken.
At the centre of the controversy
Christian Horner has been under scrutiny after a member of the team accused him of inappropriate behaviour. Although he was cleared of the allegations shortly before the season opener in Bahrain, leaked chat histories allegedly linked to Horner have reignited the controversy.
Jos Verstappen’s call for consequences underlines the growing tensions within the team, suggesting a risk of internal conflict.
FIA takes a hands-off approach to Horner controversy
Formula One’s governing body, the FIA, has decided not to launch its own investigation into allegations surrounding Red Bull Racing team principal Christian Horner in the absence of a formal complaint to its compliance officer. The decision comes amid widespread speculation and intrigue within the F1 paddock over Horner’s actions, overshadowing an even bigger question: who is orchestrating the effort to oust F1’s longest-serving team principal?
Normally, revelations of this nature would reveal the identity of the complainant, who often seeks justice through public support or financial compensation. In this case, however, the identity of the woman who raised concerns about Horner’s possible “inappropriate and controlling behaviour” remains undisclosed, casting doubt on the likelihood that she was responsible for leaking the alleged evidence.
FIA powerless to intervene in Horner saga
Who was behind the story?
Speculation has been rife, particularly following the death of Red Bull’s patriarchal figure, Didi Mateschitz, which has reportedly sparked infighting within the company’s leadership. The battle lines appear to have been drawn between the two factions of the ownership, with one side pushing for Horner’s dismissal and the other defending his position and contributions to the team’s success.
Mark Mateschitz, Didi’s son, and Red Bull chief executive Oliver Mintzlaff are reportedly in favour of a change of leadership, with ambitions to centralise Red Bull’s operations in Austria. Such a move would mark a significant shift from Red Bull Racing’s current level of autonomy from the company’s headquarters in Salzburg.
Wolff surprisingly backs Red Bull
Thai side of Red Bull supports Horner
In Horner’s corner is the Thai businessman, part of the Yoovidhya family who co-founded Red Bull, whose support is crucial given his significant stake in the company. This backing from the Yoovidhya family has, for the moment, protected Horner from dismissal.
The manner in which the dossier against Horner was disseminated, targeting key figures within F1, suggests a well-coordinated effort with significant backing. However, a subsequent release of evidence, expected after qualifying in Bahrain, failed to materialise, suggesting a possible reassessment by those orchestrating the campaign against Horner.
Amid these developments, reports have emerged that a relative of the complainant is prepared to publicly address the controversy following the leak of the investigation’s findings via an anonymous email, further complicating the saga surrounding Horner’s leadership and future at Red Bull Racing.
The men behind the Horner assassination attempt
Verstappen points finger at Horner
Jos Verstappen voiced his concerns to the Daily Mail of this civil war within Red Bull saying: “The team is in danger of being torn apart. It can’t go on like this. It will escalate. He is playing the victim but he is the one causing the problems,”
This statement clearly indicates a strong stance against Horner’s leadership. Reports of a heated argument in Horner’s office add to the complexity, with suggestions that Verstappen could be part of a campaign against Horner.
The newspaper also reveals that there had already been a “violent argument” in Horner’s office in the paddock on Friday evening. Horner is said to even suspect Verstappen of being involved in the leaks and of staging a campaign against him in order to remove him from power. A strong accusation.
Perez admits first mistake of the season
Jos denies being involved, Horner bullish
In light of these allegations, Jos, Michael Schumacher’s former team-mates, has described the idea of him orchestrating a campaign against Horner as illogical, especially in light of Max Verstappen’s current success with the team.
“That wouldn’t make any sense,” said Verstappen senior in response to the accusation in the Daily Mail.
“Why should I do that when Max is doing so well here?”
Horner himself responded to the situation by emphasising his intention to continue to lead Red Bull Racing throughout the season. He cited the thorough internal investigation conducted by an independent investigator, which resulted in the dismissal of the complaint against him.
Horner “absolutely” believes that he will lead the Red Bull racing team as team boss throughout the season.
“There was a comprehensive, lengthy internal procedure that was completed by an independent investigator. And the complaint that was made was dismissed. That’s it,” says Horner.
The Renault threat to pull the plug on Alpine F1
Future outlook amid dispute
As Horner looks to the future, the ongoing controversy casts a shadow over Red Bull Racing’s achievements. The situation, highlighted by Jos Verstappen’s criticism, points to deeper issues within the team’s culture and leadership. This appears to be occurring below the bigger power struggle within the Red Bull brand itself.
As the season unfolds, Red Bull Racing faces the challenge of maintaining its competitive edge while dealing with internal discord. A story with much intrigue will continue to unfold it seems.
READ MORE: Ricciardo says team mate Tsunoda “immature”
MORE F1 NEWS: Hamilton critical as Mercedes engineers make rookie mistake
Lewis Hamilton had been relaxed an upbeat prior to the start of the Formula One season opening race in Bahrain. Mercedes had their first 1-2 in any free practice session since Hungary last year and their long run pace looked competitive with Ferrari.
The seven times world champion had an underwhelming qualifying and finished just P9 some three tenths slower than team mate George Russell who started he race third behind Charles Leclerc and pole sitter Max Verstappen…READ MORE ON THIS STORY
With over 30 years of experience in Formula 1 as an insider journalist, I have built trusted connections across the paddock, from race engineers and mechanics to senior team figures. At The Judge 13, I and a handful of trusted colleagues share exclusive Formula 1 news, expert analysis and behind-the-scenes stories you will not find in mainstream motorsport media.
I don’t feel Horner IS playing the victim, and I’m sure he will have been bound by the rules of the investigation to refrain from commenting (as would BOTH parties – so the OTHER party is in breach) … and Jos Verstappen is NOT a member of the RBR Team – simply the Father of a member of that team! Why even bother to ask for HIS opinion?
Well put. Anybody in a management or HR roles or people ever been involved in a disiplanary role would know one of the first things mentioned in an investigation would be “any thing that is discussed here would remain cofidential and is not to be discussed out side of this room with the exception of your representative.” They would also recieve a written copy of that to be signed as well as a written copy of the minutes for them to also sign.
On that any party found to breach the confidensiality would result in a further investigation leading upto and not excluding discisal.
So Horner legaly (and all other parties including witnesses etc) would not be able to discuss it. So it time for the media to just stop an Totto and Zak to get off their high horses as they to would know he or anybody are not able to discuss it. They should think what if tables were reversed!
On that if the complaintant was not happy with the result (same for the accused) have a right of appeal.
If it was appealed or or if the complaintant desides to take it further to court (imployment tribunal) then it is usually an open court, and the minutes of that would also be available as a public record request.
So lets now stop this. Only reason this is bad for F1 is the ruthless non stop questioning by media, who also would know internal investigation are kept private and confidential for ALL parties involved not just the Complaintant and accused.
The other party is free to press charges at the police. As long as they don’t, it’s an internal RB case and nothing else. Everybody else, including Toto, Zack and FIA, can have an opinion but nothing more than that.
There appears to be only one person trying to tear the team apart and that person is Jos. It would be interesting to know what his real agenda is.
What people don’t mention is there is a victim in this and she made a formal complaint. Was it brushed under the carpet ? maybe we will never know.
Jos didn’t make it as a F1-driver, was not the best husband, and clearly a bad influence on Max.
Personally I think that Max knows that Fernando, Charles, Carlos, Lando and even George might win in the RB, if the Verstappen’s were to split from RB and go somewhere else. Max needs the car more than RB needs him. But, it is such a successful combination, just get rid of Jos.