Brundle: Lack of Hamilton penalty “curious”

Formula One commentator and ex-F1 driver Martin Brundle believes ir was “curios” Lewis Hamilton was not penalised by the stewards during the Abu Dhabi GP. During the opening lap Lewis Hamilton was battling to keep Carlos Sainz behind, when the Ferrari driver made a move down the inside into turn 6 after the back straight.

In what was reminiscent of Hamilton’s defect a year ago from Verstappen the British driver left the circuit, cut the corner and rejoined keeping the position ahead of Sainz. 

 

 

F1 Stewards decision contradictory

The stewards initially decided to investigate Carlos for forcing another driver off the track, but onboard video footage clearly showed he had left Hamilton space.

“Sainz was correctly exonerated after being investigated for forcing Hamilton off, who was then asked to hand the place back to Sainz which he duly did,” explained Brundle in his column for Sky Sports.

The stewards then announced they were investigating Hamilton for gaining an unfair advantage. Then Lewis was told by his engineer “we’ve been asked to give the place back.”

Hamilton duly allowed the Ferrari through before taking the place back legitimately on the next lap. Brundle thinks it was curious Hamilton was not given a penalty.

“Then It was announced by race control that there would be no further action for gaining an advantage off track and curiously Hamilton was exonerated too.”

 

 

Was protocol breached?

There was a breach in stewarding protocol which has changed for 2022. In previous years Michael Massi would discuss such matters with the stewards and advise a driver whether he needed to yield a position or suffer a penalty.

However, since Massi’s departure, the communication between race control and the teams has become formalised in an attempt to prevent persistent badgering of the FIA representatives.

Stewards have not been advising drivers this season to yield a place, they merely issue a penalty if they adjudicate a driver has gained an unfair advantage.

It was clear having found Sainz the all clear for forcing Hamilton off the track then it had to be the case that Lewis’ cutting the Chicano would result in the stewards deciding he had gained an advantage.

 

 

Bono intervention

Could it be that when the stewards revealed they were investigating Hamilton, Bono his engineer anticipated the impending penalty and merely phrased the instruction to Lewis in a manner designed to force Hamilton’s compliance.

Having yielded the place the stewards then subsequently decided no advantage had been gained, though bizarrely within a lap Hamilton had passed Sainz and his Ferrari.

However, the Mercedes duo completely misjudged the early part of the race burning through their tyres by pushing harder than their Red Bull and Ferrari rivals.

Lewis was forced to retire his car after his first pit stop which astonishingly was Mercedes only mechanical failure of the entire 22 race long season.

READ MORE: Study shows Red Bull “shocking” abuse

10 responses to “Brundle: Lack of Hamilton penalty “curious”

  1. As I have said MANY times over – the rules for Lewis Scumilton differs from the rules of the other drivers. This scumbag constantly escape penalties whereas the other drivers get the penalty for Scumilton’s infringements. Everything is always a racing incident when the scumbag is the culprit. And you all still wonder how Scumilton managed his “7 titles”? Being black, left, a BLM knee crawling cockroach is the new innocent in the world. Gay also comes to mind

      • #LM44. #LivingLegend. #F1’sGOAT. #STILLIRISE.
        HOW SMALL MINDED U & ALL THE HATERS MUST BE, TO SERIOUSLY BELIEVE THAT #LM44 GETS AWAY WITH ANY KIND OF INCIDENTS ON OR OFF TRACK!!
        IF THIS WAS THE CASE THEN
        SIR. LEWIS HAMILTON WOULD BE F1 WORLD CHAMPION 8 TIMES & NOT JUST A 7 TIMES GOD DAMN GREAT!!! SO SHOW SOME RESPECT FOR THE MAN EVEN IF HE’S NOT YOUR CUP OF TEA…
        HE’S THE GREATEST OF HIS GENERATION & ENDING THE OLD DRIVERS & INTERRUPTING THE START OF THE NEW GENERATION BCUS HE WILL WIN ANOTHER TITLE, THAT’S FOR SURE MY FRIEND.
        SO TAKE A KNEE, NOT FOR #BLM BUT OUT OF RESPECT FOR THE GREATEST FORMULA 1 DRIVER TO GRACE THIS 🌏….
        #LM44 #GOAT #BLM

    • Not interested in Martin “Redbull Brundle’s opinion. Sky F1 cancelled and back to enjoying watching the sport I love without the incompetent trio of commentators that Sky F1. Can live with highlights and good comentry, than paying to listen to those morons.

  2. Well, anytime Hamilton gets held accountable he claims racism. He has been doing that for over a decade.
    No one can survive that accusation in todays world so the stewards are afraid of him. Any chance they can just over look his actions they will.

  3. Let’s see — Hamilton was forced off the track, sustained damage to his car, then gave the place back. Tell me again why a penalty and who should have gotten it.

    • Forced off the road 😂 he was behind! It was clearly not his corner!
      Sustained damage 🤔 100% Self inflicted, no sympathy!
      Gave the place back 🙄 Only when told to by race control, that’s way too late.

      He should have got a penalty for gaining an advantage by leaving the track and not giving it back before being instructed to do so by race control. Those are the rules and, although this may come as a surprise, even Sir Lewis is required to follow the rules!

    • The rules says you have to give the spot back immediately with our orders.
      Hamilton did not do that.

      And he wasn’t forced off the track…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.