Hakkinen returns to racing, no surprises who for…

After more than five years Formula 1 legend Mika Häkkinen celebrates his comeback in a racing car. The Finn starts on Sunday in McLaren at the 10-hour race in Suzuka (Japan).

The F1 World Champion of 1998 and 1999 will contest the official GT race in Japan together with Katsuaki Kubota and Hiroaki Ishiura in a McLaren 720S GT3 (500 hp).

“The car looks amazing,” wrote the 50-year-old at Instagram. With Markus Winkelhock and Kamui Kobayashi, two other ex-Formula 1 pilots will also be on board. Häkkinen most recently competed in a GT race in November 2013.

It’s no real surprise to see the original ‘flying Finn’ drive a McLaren, as the Woking based squad were the ones that Championed Hakkinen throughout most of his Formula 1 career.


It’s also a return to a very special place: In Suzuka he clinched his first WRC title at the end of the 90s and defended it the following year.

During his Formula 1 time, Häkkinen fought a big duel with record world champion Michael Schumacher. First he relegated the Ferrari man to second place in 1998, then in 2000 Schumi grabbed the Formula 1 crown again in front of the Finn.



OPINION: Mika Hakkinen was not that good

Brought to you by TJ13 contributor: The Grumpy Jackal

Being allowed a platform to spout forth my ramblings, I thought I would put some perspective back. I’m going to consign Mika Hakkinen back to his rightful place rather than the misguided belief that has been seemingly set in stone over the last quarter of a century.

What the hell is the Jackal suggesting ask the voices inside my head? Essentially, Mika was nothing of note, he won titles in an Adrian Newey designed car which every other such driver has had to thank the balding genius for. I’d imagine some people are quizzing my thoughts as I type, but bear with me.

1992, Nigel Mansell won the title in a NEWEY Williams. In 1993, Prost cantered to the title with ridiculous ease, again in a NEWEY Williams. 1996 and 1997, it was Damon Hill and Jacques Villeneuve respectively and if we fast forward to 2010 through to 2013 – Sebestian Vettel was blessed with the skill to drive, once again you guessed it, a NEWEY design. The respective RBs.

But in 1998 and 1999, Murray Walker continuously preached about how magnificent this Flying Finn was and how he warded off the evil Italian empire to secure the titles. The icing on this particular myopic cake – get this – he beat Ayrton Senna in qualifying!! Once. No really, he vanquished the Brazilian legend in qualifying… ONCE. It’s not like De Angelis never beat the mercurial Brazilian. Fairly certain Prost and Berger did too…

If, like me, you have read contemporary reports, or any books since his death, you will know that he had lost his fight in 1993. At the start of the season he was negotiating a race by race contract due to being saddled with a Ford HB powered Mclaren against the tidal wave of Williams-Renault goodness.

He cut a disappointing figure because he couldn’t fight the overwhelming superiority of Frank’s team. He’d offered to drive for Williams in 1993 for FREE and when it was proved hat Prost’s contract had a stipulation that Senna could not join the team, Senna did not hesitate to call him out as a ‘coward’. Even so, his driving over the first few races was spell-binding.

Mika, on the other hand had been testing extensively all season as the reserve driver and was drafted in for Portugal after Michael Andretti had been released. In Portugal, Mika out-qualified Senna by the massive margin of 0.048 of a second. FORTY EIGHTH HUNDREDS!! Probably equals 3cm around a lap.

So with our ‘hero’ ahead of Ayrton, he disappeared, finishing miles ahead, right? Nope. Senna got passed Hakkinen on the first lap and remained ahead till his engine blew. Hakkinen crashed into the wall on lap 33.

The next race was Japan and by now the Brazilian was no doubt dialling himself up to speed and he qualified 0.032 ahead of the Finn. Ayrton went on to win the race finishing 26 seconds ahead of his team-mate. Or over a 53 lap race he was half a second a lap slower.

The final race of the season was the Australian Grand Prix at Adelaide, and it is here that you see the difference between genius and merely fast. Senna in a Mclaren-Ford qualified on pole ahead of the erstwhile dominant Williams – nearly half a second quicker. Mika languished in fifth a full seven tenths slower than his team-mate. The race was no contest.

Twenty-five years later it sadly remains as Senna’s 41st and final victory – man overcoming the machine in quite spectacular fashion and maybe, just maybe, I should thank Mika for the impetus.




One response to “Hakkinen returns to racing, no surprises who for…

  1. You just failed your GCSE in English : “Senna got passed Hakkinen” should read “got past”. Your sentence turns out to have the OPPOSITE meaning of what you intended to convey.
    Similarly, your entire article is based on the premises that:
    1) Everyone who had a Newey car could win titles (but only one from any given team could do this) and not every Newey car has won a WDC every year.
    2) That Senna was not unbeatable and anyone who did not finish in front of Senna wasn’t a worthy champion.
    Senna was driving in an era of extraordinary competitiveness – Mansell, Prost, Piquet were all fighting for wins and places but they were in different cars at different times – some Newey designs and some not.
    Hakkinen may not have had the mercurial genius of Senna and may not have had the playboy flair of Piquet or James Hunt or studious professorial attitude of Prost but he got the job done.
    At a time when some commentators were saying that Schumacher was perfection as a racing driver, Hakkinen won two world championships ahead of Schumi (I know his fans are going to say that he was just getting Ferrari up to speed and dialling in the crew and designers but he had two full years for that… and when he finally did get the Ferrari tractor moving, he had to resort to dirty tactics to defend his position).

    In other words, comparing Senna with Hakkinen is a bit unfair when we all know that Senna was in the Top Three of Grand Prix competitors (Clark and Fangio the other two) and at the height of his powers. Moreover, comparing Hakkinen with Schumi is not only fair but also a truer reflection of where Hakkinen had reached at a time when many were praising the ‘wunderkind’ and, as proved by subsequent events, the German had almost no other competition. In that respect, By implication, therefore, Hakkinen was a better driver than Schumacher, which I am happy to accept but many fans will decry as ridiculous.
    They all raced in their respective machinery and respective eras but credit where credit’s due. Hakkinen took on the best in the world (because almost every driver in F1 – even Lance Stroll – is a cracking racing driver) and he won two WDCs when there were many other guys who were driving against him, including his team mate, who all wanted the same thing.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.