Many say Alonso is the best driver in the world. This may be so, or it might be more evident if he could finish a race, but if it is, and we take a look at the current driver standing we might also make a couple of assumptions that:
- He is also either the most unlucky former world champion (or)
- He is unmotivated (or)
- This year has been taken damage limitation action so as to minimise the effect of the last couple of years has had on his F1 record.
I have a few times before suggested that Alonso simply will not allow himself to finish in the bottom of the grid. It is just my theory. Nearly each time this has looked the case so far in 2017 he has retired the car rather than the car stopping.
Between the two McLaren drivers, there is now a points gap of two positions and three world championship points in Vandoorne’s favour.
This gap, some may point out is because Alonso was absent from Monaco, and Vandoorne has, therefore, had more races, indeed McLaren seemed strong at Monaco, qualifying in the top 10 but factor in that Alonso’s shortage of opportunities due to his American vacation (which also ended short of success by a Honda PU failure) was matched by a Vandoorne retirement (Accident). Alonso may well have been influential there and by missing out may well have allowed a gap in the driver’s championship to his detriment.
Alonso could have been influential there and by missing out may well have allowed a gap in the driver’s championship to his detriment.
Nearly 50% of all Alonso’s retirements went past 50 laps. On average across all retirements, he ran an average of 63% race distance. At 4 Notable races, he passed 90% before his reputation was “SAVED” by registering a RET rather than falling into Vandoorne’s shadow.
At the only 3 races at which they both endured a finish (Azerbaijan, Hungary, and Malaysia), the finishing position differential has averaged out to -1 in Alonso’s favour, which means Vandoorne is keeping Alonso honest and is totally worthy of his place. Since the summer break this differential averages out to ZERO, which is quite an achievement for a rookie versus the multiple world champion that McLaren seems to have built a team around.
SOME STATS – 2017 Season.
Not surprisingly the best GP for McLaren was post-summer break at Hungary where both cars finishing in the points, no doubt driven by Alonso’s demands of making a post-holiday decision on his future.
- VAN has finished in the points 3 times Vs ALO 2 (Monaco could have evened this up)
- VAN has completed 720 laps V’s ALO 559 (Diff of 161)
- VAN completed 2271 miles V’s ALO 1826 (which is a difference of 445 miles or 2.5 Grand Prix’s)
- VAN’s average qualification positions have been 12.4 V’s ALO 11 (Both failed to qualify once) which shows if Alonso is getting the best out of the car, VAN has (on average) taken his legitimate grid space behind him.
- VAN’s average finishing position has been 11.4 V’s ALO 7.6 so when Alonso has not parked up has made good advances and VAN has been consistent.
- VAN has RET rate of 33% V’s ALO’s 60%
Best QUAL POS:
- VAN 7 (MALY HONDA HOME GP)
- ALO 7 (SPAIN – ALO HOME GP)
Suggest maximising the package where it matters most?
- VAN 7 (x2)
- ALO 6 (HUNG)
Despite Vandoorne holding his own, I still believe that Alonso is still the cornerstone of the team. I feel that the now-defunct Honda deal for free engines relied on McLaren presenting a winning chassis and world championship driver. Now that finished (no doubt by Honda falling foul of performance clauses) I feel he was a key in securing a Renault deal, and of course not to mention now being, even more, key in securing enough sponsorship to offset the cost of the supply. I just wonder at what point he will be too expensive to justify if newbies like Vandoorne are showing to be a safe bet and perhaps a better management decision gamble? Especially, as suggested by TJ13 compatriot Cav, Norris is waiting in the wings, and we know Norris is a particular favourite of Zak Brown, who already displays his racing helmet in his office…
What I’m waiting to hear is the length of Alonso’s contract. If it’s one year it is effectively putting him on notice that he’d better perform or Norris could be brought in.
Shouldnt you be on a Skiddyrear Ferrari forum when youre not here getting lost?
Even if it’s longer there will be legal escape roads on both sides I reckon.
Escape road cost Senna the 89 title!
Both of you are talking shite and also noit related to the question! Try staying on topic and not daydreaming about bulls crapping in a field ffs! #:)
D.Duck are you the new forum police?
nah….only messing around. #:)
Fernando is balls out every race…..the teams retire the power units to save mileage……FA always pushes when he can if he has half a chance of a higher position. #:)
A week ago, someone named Duck got burned by Joe Saward – just sayin’
Wasnt me. I only go to Joes once in a blue moon. #:)
I’m pretty certain Malaysia isn’t HOME to anyone/thing in the McLaren-Honda partnership.
It’s good to see Vandoorne starting to make the McHonda look average, rather then earlier in the year when it was the McHonda making him look average.
McLaren can’t afford to let Alonso go. He is the only thing that keeps them from being a backmarker team. In terms of results the already are, but if they loose Alonso they are basically Tyrell in the early 90’s status.
VanDoorne WANTS to do well, and NEEDS to,
you dont know what and with who was honda testing in any of those races. (most of the time they were just testing). so your analysis is useless.
–I have a few times before suggested that Alonso simply will not allow himself to finish in the bottom of the grid. It is just my theory. Nearly each time this has looked the case so far in 2017 he has retired the car rather than the car stopping.
Yes, but aren’t there sometimes good reasons for doing this in terms of what you’re then allowed to change on the car (gearbox?) without taking grid penalties at the next race? Besides, given the (un)reliability of that engine, I could also see them wanting to minimise mileage if there’s no chance of getting points!