Ferrari’s hand forced over Kimi Raikkonen

kimi

F1 fans with more than a Lewis Hamilton era of Formula One experience, will understand immediately that the timing of Ferrari’s announcement to retain Kimi Raikkonen reveals there is an air of desperation in Maranello.

The red team is the ultimate in F1 swagger and in many ways the sum of the parts are less than the whole. This means at times, the drivers are reminded by Ferrari top brass of their very small place in this global F1 institution that was spawned by the great Enzo.

Part of the process is to leave the driver line-up announcements as late is possible in the season. Announcing the Maranello line up for next year by the time of the British GP is almost without precedent.

Three years into the new V6 Turbo era, Ferrari were supposed to be doing better than they are. Since the exile of Luca de Montezemolo, Sergio Marchionne has upped the anti making clear the levels of performance he expects from the Scuderia.

The close season pressure began to be cranked up when in early December, the Ferrari CEO told the Italian F1 media: “The balance sheet of Ferrari is good. What we need now is results on the track. It is important to win the first race of the season in Australia.”

Then again during pre-season testing, Marchionne made clear his championship aspirations for 2016. “If we were to somehow fail to win a title over a 10-year span, it would be a tragedy.” Ferrari’s last drivers’ title was from Kimi Raikkonen in 2007 and the team won the constructors’ title in 2008.

Most F1 observers would agree, that Ferrari have failed to deliver this year and are missing the expected mark by some considerable fashion. The capabilities of the SF16-H are still mostly inferior to Mercedes W07 and Maranello’s the race team has made inexplicable strategy decisions during the race – costing the team a significant number of points.

So for these reasons alone, there is little point trying to create any kind of ‘insecurity’ in Ferrari’s drivers – as some kind of attempt to drive them to deliver better results. The focus on performance improvement for now lies elsewhere.

Kimi Raikkonen is clearly not as capable of delivering points for Maranello as either Fernando Alonso did or as Sebastian Vettel has done since his arrival form Red Bull. Yet, why destabilise Sebastian Vettel by putting a young gun up against him who in theory should push him harder than Kimi Raikkonen?

The retention of Kimi Raikkonen is believed to be a win for Sebastian Vettel and Maurizio Arrivabene given that less than two weeks ago, Sergio Marchionne made it clear Raikkonen’s future was as yet conditional. “We are under no illusion with Kimi, his stay depends on the way he races,” Ferrari’s CEO explained to La Gazzetta dello Sport.

Since then Kimi failed to capitalise on starting the Austrian GP ahead of both Red Bull cars but was beaten to second place by Max Verstappen who started P8. The actual reason for Raikkonen not beating the Dutchman was arguably due to poor Ferrari strategy, beyond Kimi’s control.

Either way, Kimi has not been able to meet Marchionne’s performance demands to ‘earn’ his renewed drive for 2017.

Another of Maranello’s ‘fears’ may well have played into Kimi’s hands. 2017 sees a big change in regulations and to bed in a rookie to Ferrari during this season would be disruptive and counterproductive. Further, some F1 commentators believe the new regulations will bring the kind of cars F1 develops back towards the ‘ice Man’s’ driving style. The Finn prefers to make the car do the work, rather than having to manhandle a raging beast around an F1 circuit.

In conclusion, it is also telling that Ferrari have moved quickly following the announcement by Red Bull Racing that Carlos Sainz Jnr would be retained for one more season. In recent weeks, Sainz weeks was believed by many to be the favoured ‘new son’ for Maranello to recruit.

Advertisements

5 responses to “Ferrari’s hand forced over Kimi Raikkonen

  1. Yep, it all sounds to me that the ship has sailed for the likes of grosjean, Perez, Hulkenberg and possibly Bottas. Andd that nobody at Ferrari considered them an upgrade over Kimi.

    • But who does?
      They all looked great but somehow all of them are not flawless. I know, Kimi sure isn’t flawless but Ferrari are a loyal bunch: if there’s no one available looking mightily better, then we stick with the Guy who gave us our last WDC. (As with Massa: the Guy almost died. Let’s stick with him – and humiliate him on the birthday of his accident)

      My money’s on Hamilton. Marketing wise there’s no equal. And of course he’s top 3.

  2. I agree with SkySports as Manulf mentions above.
    http://www.skysports.com/f1/news/12433/10495639/kimi-raikkonen-stays-in-2017-but-are-ferrari-waiting-for-lewis-hamilton

    All the reasons listed in the article are not the real reason, they are added benefits to the real reason, which might be Hamilton. And no Sainz or Perez would want to go to Ferrari for one year and then thrown out.

    Also, something that Sky and this article did not do, is link the timing of this announcement with the aftermath of the collision in Austria. It’s a bit like Ferrari saying right now ‘Look Lewis, with the new regs next year, if we’re going the right direction, and it doesn’t work out for you and Merc, we’re waiting, Kimi’s our stopping gap till you tell us come and get me’.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s