Last Updated on April 21 2026, 10:12 pm
FIA signals progress after driver backlash over 2026 rules – Following growing criticism from Formula 1 drivers regarding the direction of upcoming regulations, particularly those shaping the 2026 era, the FIA has issued an encouraging update. Following a tense period between drivers, teams, and governing bodies, the latest discussions appear to have taken a more constructive turn.
FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem expressed clear optimism after engaging directly with drivers, suggesting that their concerns are now being properly acknowledged. He described himself as “delighted” to be able to share positive news after what he characterised as productive talks.
Drivers’ concerns finally gaining traction
Much of the unrest has centred on the performance of the next generation of cars, especially their heavy reliance on energy management. Drivers have been vocal about the lack of freedom to push consistently, with races increasingly being dictated by battery harvesting rather than outright pace.
One of the most striking criticisms came from Fernando Alonso, who pointed out that certain parts of circuits are effectively becoming ‘battery recharge zones’. This view has been widely echoed across the grid, with drivers arguing that the current approach undermines the essence of Formula 1.
The Grand Prix Drivers Association chairman, Carlos Sainz of Williams, had much to say on the topic:
“As the GPDA, we warned the FIA that these accidents would happen under these regulations,” said the GPDA chairman, highlighting the dangers in the races following Oliver Bearman’s heavy crash.
“Just imagine what sort of crashes this would lead to in Las Vegas and Baku. I hope this serves as an example and that the FIA and the FOM listen to the drivers rather than the teams and those who say the racing was fine. This is not OK,”
“I really hope the FIA reconsiders this and that the teams don’t take such a hard line, because it’s clear that these regulations have issues that need to be resolved before we head to Miami.”
Downsides of a rule change “do not matter”
Sainz says it doesn’t matter what the downside of such a rule change might be.
“We have to find the solution and do whatever is necessary. I don’t care if we’re a second slower per lap. If we have to reduce the electric power to ensure it lasts longer and we need to use less superclipping and less lift and coast and become less reliant on the boost, then I’m convinced it will be safer.”
“I think it will also be more enjoyable, because we won’t be so dependent on energy consumption. I don’t mind, but we need to find a solution. We need to improve as a racing series, and if they listen to the drivers, they’ll make changes.”
The FIA now appears to be taking these concerns seriously. Ben Sulayem has indicated that the governing body is open to adjustments and is carefully evaluating the feedback provided.
Safety takes priority over politics
A key theme in the FIA’s stance is its willingness to intervene on safety grounds if necessary. Sulayem made it clear that safety will not be compromised, even if it means implementing changes without the teams’ unanimous agreement.
This is significant, given that political consensus is usually required for Formula 1 regulation changes. However, the FIA retains the authority to act unilaterally when safety is at stake, and appears prepared to do so if necessary.
Recent incidents have only strengthened the drivers’ case. Accidents, including one involving Oliver Bearman, have raised concerns that the cars’ current characteristics could introduce unnecessary risks, particularly when drivers are forced into awkward energy-saving scenarios.
Teams remain cautious amid heavy investment
While the drivers are united in their criticism, the teams are taking a more measured approach. Having already invested heavily in developing the next generation of power units, many are reluctant to support radical changes.
From their perspective, stability is crucial. Some teams believe that the issues can be resolved through targeted adjustments, such as changes to qualifying formats, rather than a comprehensive overhaul of the regulations.
This difference in priorities has created natural tension within the sport, with the drivers pushing for fundamental improvements and the teams aiming to protect their investments.
A potential turning point
Despite these differences, the tone of the latest update suggests that progress is being made. The FIA’s openness to dialogue, combined with its firm stance on safety, could pave the way for meaningful changes.
With drivers becoming more vocal and the FIA now more receptive, the balance may be about to shift. If the governing body follows through on its willingness to act, the 2026 regulations could evolve into something that satisfies everyone, without compromising safety or the spirit of competition.
Stanton is a London-based journalist specialising in sports business and sponsorship. With a degree in economics and years reporting for business-focused publications, Stanton translates F1’s complex financial world into clear, compelling narratives.
