George Russell urges patience over new F1 rules – Following the recent test days in Bahrain, the debate surrounding Formula 1’s new engine and energy regulations has intensified. Several drivers have expressed concerns about the altered driving style that the new technical framework requires. Max Verstappen was among the most outspoken, questioning aspects of the new package.
However, Mercedes driver George Russell has taken a more measured stance, while also delivering a pointed remark in Verstappen’s direction.
“We’re only four days into a set of rules that will be in place for three years,” he said. “The progress everyone will make in the first few months will be enormous. I think it’s a step forward, and as always, I’ll take it as an opportunity.”
For Russell, perspective is key. He argues that early frustrations are inevitable whenever Formula 1 resets the technical landscape. What matters is the long-term trajectory and the opportunities it creates.

Russell: “More agile, more enjoyable.”
One of the biggest talking points has been how the new generation of cars feels to drive. While some drivers have struggled with the adjustments, Russell has identified some advantages.
“The cars are more fun to drive,” he explained. “I’ve only driven smaller F1 cars twice before, and I couldn’t believe how much more agile these cars are. The car feels lighter and smaller, that’s a very positive thing.”
Compared to the heavier ground-effect era machines, the current package provides a more responsive driving experience. For drivers accustomed to wrestling with larger, heavier cars, this added nimbleness is a welcome change.
Yet Russell acknowledges that enjoyment doesn’t erase the complexity beneath the surface, particularly with regard to the power units.
Engine complexity and early growing pains
The new engines, featuring revised hybrid systems and altered energy deployment strategies, have been described as some of the most complicated power units in Formula 1 history. Russell has immense respect for the engineering challenge involved.
“The engines are, frankly, very complicated,” he said. “They probably cause more headaches for the engineers than the drivers.”
However, he cautioned against drawing firm conclusions too early. Testing at circuits such as Bahrain and Barcelona offers only limited insight.
“These are probably two of the easier tracks for the engines,” he noted. “I don’t want to get ahead of ourselves until we’ve driven in Melbourne or Jeddah. Those will be much bigger challenges for the engines and energy management.”
In other words, the true test of the regulations will come under more demanding conditions.
READ MORE – “This is ridiculous” Lewis Hamilton’s Ferrari ‘Truth Bomb’ in Bahrain
A new driving style to master
Much of the criticism surrounding the new regulations has focused on how drivers must now approach corners and deploy energy. The need to maintain turbo speed and maximise energy recovery has fundamentally altered racing lines and gear selection.
“The challenge we face is having to use very low gears in the corners,” Russell explained.
“Here in Bahrain, we normally drive through Turn 1 in third gear. Now, however, we have to stay in first gear to keep the revs high and ensure the turbo keeps spinning.”
He admits that the sensation can feel unnatural
“Sometimes it feels like you’re driving with a handbrake on when you’re in such a low gear. That’s probably what’s so annoying, it’s not intuitive at all.”
Nevertheless, Russell believes that adaptation is part of the sport’s DNA. Drivers have always had to adjust to technical changes, and this era is no different.
“You can’t complain about the amount of energy when you have the full 350 kW available,” he added. “It’s going to be a huge process to make progress in this area in the coming months, but we’re going to give it a try.”
READ MORE – 8th Title Chances? Lewis Hamilton Stunned by 2026 F1 Cars
The bigger picture: Manufacturers and electrification
Russell also highlighted an often-overlooked factor: the reason these regulations were introduced in the first place. The sport’s leadership designed the new engine formula to secure long-term commitment from manufacturers and attract new brands.
That strategy appears to have worked. Audi is preparing to enter Formula 1, while Ford has committed to a return, and Honda has maintained its involvement — all of which is partly due to the stronger focus on hybrid and electrification.
“When these rules were introduced, there was a clear push from the EU towards electric cars,” said Russell.
“That was important in persuading Audi to enter Formula 1. It’s something you have to take into account.”
For Russell, compromise is inevitable.
“As with everything in life, you can’t tick every box. The stakes are higher. Of course, we want the fastest cars and the best racing, but I don’t know how you can satisfy everyone.”
MORE NEWS – Hamilton eyes up a different sport: Could F1 take a backseat?
Is Mercedes hiding something?
It is also worth noting that Russell’s optimism may be related to Mercedes’ own situation. Throughout testing, there has been quiet speculation in the paddock that Mercedes could be ‘sandbagging’, running conservative engine modes or heavier fuel loads to disguise a potential performance advantage in both their powertrain and overall car package.
If there is any truth in these rumours, it would naturally make Russell more comfortable with the new regulations. A strong foundation in this area would transform adaptation into an opportunity and criticism into background noise.
While there is no hard evidence yet that Mercedes holds a decisive edge, the team’s calm demeanour during testing has only fuelled the intrigue. Should the Silver Arrows emerge as early frontrunners, Russell’s confidence in Formula 1’s direction will appear less like blind optimism and more like quiet certainty.
A subtle dig at Verstappen
Although Russell’s tone was generally pragmatic, he couldn’t resist taking a final jab at his rival. Verstappen had been particularly vocal about his dissatisfaction with the new cars and the altered feel.
Russell’s response? A dry suggestion: “As Lando said, we’re privileged to be in this position. Honestly, I just want to win. Every driver who’s won recently just wants the best car and to enjoy it as much as possible.”
Then came the sting.
“So yes, I guess Max Verstappen can always go racing on the Nordschleife.”
This was clearly a reference to the legendary German circuit, which is often associated with pure, old-school driving thrills. Whether playful or pointed, the message was unmistakable: Formula 1 evolves, and those who adapt the quickest tend to come out on top.
READ MORE – Support for Verstappen after aggressive attack
NEXT ARTICLE – Horner Linked to £2.5 Billion Alpine Takeover
Christian Horner is connected to the £2.5 billion takeover of Alpine – Former Red Bull Racing team principal Christian Horner is at the centre of growing speculation surrounding a potential £2.5 billion takeover of Alpine, with discussions ongoing with investment firm MSP Sports Capital.
The 52-year-old Briton is reportedly considering a return to Formula 1 in a different capacity, not as an employee, but as a controlling stakeholder. If the deal materialises, it would be one of the most significant shifts in ownership in the history of modern F1 and could reshape Alpine’s long-term future.
Talks with Existing Shareholders
Back in January, Alpine confirmed that Horner was part of a group interested in acquiring the 24 per cent stake currently held by Otro Capital. The remaining 76 per cent is owned by parent company Renault Group.
At the time, Alpine clarified that discussions were taking place directly with shareholders rather than with the team management.
“All approaches or discussions are with the existing shareholders, Otro Capital (24%) and Renault Group (76%), and not directly with Flavio Briatore or the team,” read the statement.
According to Sky News, the potential deal would value Alpine at between $2 billion and $2.5 billion. This estimate is similar to Forbes’s most recent valuation, which put the Enstone-based outfit at around $2.45 billion, highlighting just how much Formula 1 team values have increased in recent…CONTINUE READING
With over 30 years of experience in Formula 1 as an insider journalist, I have built trusted connections across the paddock, from race engineers and mechanics to senior team figures. At The Judge 13, I and a handful of trusted colleagues share exclusive Formula 1 news, expert analysis and behind-the-scenes stories you will not find in mainstream motorsport media.
Alex Stanton is a Formula 1 journalist at TJ13 with a focus on the financial and commercial dynamics that underpin the sport. Alex contributes reporting and analysis on team ownership structures, sponsorship trends, and the evolving business model of Formula 1.
At TJ13, Alex covers topics including manufacturer investment, cost cap implications, and the strategic direction of teams navigating an increasingly complex financial environment. Alex’s work often examines how commercial decisions translate into on-track performance and long-term competitiveness.
With a strong interest in the intersection of sport and business, Alex provides context around Formula 1’s global growth, including media rights, expansion markets, and manufacturer influence.
Alex’s reporting aims to explain the financial realities behind headline stories, helping readers understand how money, governance, and strategy shape the competitive order in Formula 1.



Oh dear oh dear – sometimes I’m embarrassed to be British!
Both GR and LN would just LOVE MV to leave F1, wouldn’t they … to give them a better chance at the Championship!
But DC has made a VERY valid point: MV is a four times World Champion and indisputably the BEST driver out there – he’s entitled to HIS opinion as much as anyone else.