Media: Hamilton quits

Hamilton retirement: Media now clutching at straws – Much of the British Formula One media, including broadcaster Sky TV, have revealed their hands in the past days. Shrieking for a black flag and in the moment blaming Verstappen for his collision with Charles Leclerc and the initial contact with Russell, the Sky commentary booth at the Spanish Grand Prix was positively anti-Max Verstappen.

As it turned out the channel’s own F1 analysts, Anthony Davidson, demonstrated not long after that it was Leclerc who turned in on Verstappen whilst ‘trying to avoid the marbles’ as he explained in the cool down room.  Further, whilst George had made his dive bomb move, was ahead at the apex and remained on track, he failed to keep his Mercedes under control, forcing Verstappen to take to the escape route in turn one.

No matter, the damage was done. The weekend summary from Barcelona was once again about what a ‘bully’ Max is and how he must be stopped. ‘Highly dangerous’ was another ridiculous comment about his 30mph shunt with Russell in turn five, particularly given these cars are designed to take up to 50g of lateral force and crash tested at over 200mph.

 

 

 

British media anti-Verstappen

Much of this anti-Max rhetoric can be traced back to the epic F1 season of 2021, where he and British favourite, Lewis Hamilton slugged it out toe to toe, with the result that Hamilton was ‘robbed’ of a record eight title, something Sky pit lane reporter Ted Kravitz maintains to this day. The alternative version of events on that fateful day in Abu Dhabi is rarely mentioned. This is the one where Mercedes make a strategic error by not pitting Hamilton for fresh rubber before the final lap shootout with Verstappen.

Despite the decline in recent years in Hamilton’s form, the rhetoric largely remains the same. ‘Lewis is the greatest F1 driver of all time’ which statistics may suggest. Yet no mention is made of him driving for the most dominant team of all time – a record eight consecutive constructor titles – in one of the most dominant cars of all time – count the number of Mercedes 1-2 finishes where Valtteri Bottas was second but miles ahead of the field.

With Hamilton moving to Ferrari for 2025, this was the big reset opportunity he and his fans hoped would come. Having been schooled by Mercedes junior George Russell for the best part of three seasons together, Lewis moving to Ferrari was an opportunity to change the narrative.

And for Hamilton fans the early signs were good. A pole and a Sprint win in the second competitive track sessions of the season proved to be a bright start for the seven times world champion, although since then his fortunes have once again waned. In Grand prix qualifying Lewis is now 2-7 down on team mate Leclerc and across the nine Sunday races the tally is even worse at 1-8 .

Verstappen and Mercedes talk behind closed doors

 

 

 

Hamilton down on every metric

Hamilton is on average 0.233s slower than Leclerc in qualifying despite finishing ahead of him in the recent top ten shootout for pole at the Spanish Grand Prix. Again, hopes were high for Lewis in Barcelona, yet his team mate had once again outwitted him on tyre strategy.

Leclerc sacrificed two runs on fresh rubber in Q3 to save an extra set of new tyres for the race on Sunday, something which proved a masterstroke when on old soft tyres towards the end of the Grand Prix, Hamilton saw the Sauber of Nico Hulkenberg breeze by.

Ferrari and Hamilton have at times intimated his car in particular is having ‘problems’ although nine race weekends in this is not the full story. This season for Lewis is panning out like all the rest since the FIA car design regulation changes for 2022. These radically altered the way the cars need to be driven and with some 50% of the aerodynamic load being generated underneath the floor, the cars are now upper sensitive to changes in the centre of pressure.

The bottom line is the current breed of Formula One cars are radically different from almost anything seen before in the 75 year history of the sport, the drivers are having to make significant alterations in their driving style. For Daniel Ricciardo and now Lewis Hamilton, this is not something that is proving easy or even possible, after more than a decade and a half of racing the previous car designs.

F1: The Movie – too good to be true?

 

 

 

Sky F1 team believe in ‘one more year’

Whilst Ferrari are having a mediocre season, with Leclerc capable of just three podiums across the first nine Grand Prix, Hamilton is again suffering at the hands of his team mate. His average qualifying position is almost two below that of his team mate (7.00 and 8.99) as is similar to his finishing position which for Leclerc is 4.63 but Hamilton is almost two further back with an average classified position of 6.50.

Now in his fourth season of disappointment, Hamilton must be questioning how long he can continue in this vein. And indeed his supporters from the Sky commentary team are asking themselves a similar question. After a tough start to the year and having his team ate wipe the floor with him, the question was posed on this week’s Sky podcast whether Hamilton is considering retirement.

“Very simply, Lewis will be around next year,” David Croft affirmed. “He’s not going anywhere,” announced the portly but genial lead Sky commentator. Yet in the next breath Croft admitted the early season hopes born in the China Sprint have led to nothing more to write home about.

“I think we were all hoping for more positives, to be honest, especially after China, when he looked an absolute world beater once again,” Croft reflected. “He was so down on Sunday [in Barcelona]. Rachel Brookes was saying that he actually apologised to her after his interview in the pen, and he went and said sorry, because he was so down and not the best interviewee she’s ever had.

“Let’s try and offer a bit of hope on this one for him. Ferrari haven’t specified exactly what the issue was, but according to Fred Vasseur [team principal], there was an issue with the car in the final stint, and that wasn’t helping him.

Red Bull’s Max Control: Verstappen ordered to behave or face ‘disaster’ ban

 

 

 

Will the 2026 cars help Hamilton?

It appears there’s been an issue with Hamilton’s car for eight of this season’s Grand Prix if finishing behind his team mate is the measure. Its time the Hamilton fans, whether in the media or on social media, recognise their hero is long past the best of his racing prowess. 

Croft is certain Lewis will be on the grid in 2026 and with due cause. The reason Lewis left Mercedes was due to them offering him just a rolling one year contract. Ferrari guaranteed him two years’ which will take Hamilton into the next era of car design, where he might find things a little easier.

The bad news for Lewis is the ground effect principles for the 2026 F1 cars design will remain, although the newly allowed manoeuvrable front and rear wings may allow the drivers to balance the cars more to their individual liking. The reality is, unlike the immortal Fernando Alonso whose lack of Hamilton’s success drives him on despite the Spaniard approaching his mid-40’s, Lewis is being drubbed by his team mates. First George Russell and now Charles Leclerc.

“I’d be concerned. If I was Lewis, if I was on the Lewis side of the garage, engineers, etc. I’d be concerned about, ‘Okay, we’re nearly halfway through the year now”, says Karun Chandhok in response to Crofty. “We need to start understanding is this a fundamental issue, that we need to change the direction of the setup of the car… Because I’m not disputing the fact that he’s still got the ability, he clearly does. He’s able to win races, we saw in China, right?”

The Sprint race win in China was an outlier and so Chandbok is really clutching at straws. Whilst Lewis can persuade himself yet, just one more season….. the times of sand are running out on the seven times world champions F1 career and at present an eight drivers’ title appears as distant as the ever elusive horizon.

 

 

 

McLaren flexi-wing evades new FIA tests

The much awaited Spanish Grand Prix and the new technical directive introduced by the FIA to deal with flexible bodywork proved to be a damp squib. But for Red Bull attempting an audacious three stop strategy, the race would have been the usual procession we have come to know, and not love in Barcelona.

The anticipation for the penultimate F1 Grand Prix at the circuit de Catalunya was high, given the performance Red Bull appeared to have unlocked in the RB21 just two rounds earlier in Imola. There not only was Verstappen quickest in qualifying for the third time this season, but for the first time at the head of the field, the world champion drove away from the McLaren’s with ease after lap one.

Red Bull had introduced a big floor upgrade at the Emilia-Romagna weekend which they hoped would improve the downforce on their car, but without the associated drag. On its first outing it appeared as though it was the match for the McLaren 2025 package – flexi wings or not. Yet Imola was on the cool side for racing but come the searing heat of Spain, once again the MCL38 re-asserted its dominance…. READ MORE

The Judge 13 bio pic
+ posts

With over 30 years of experience in Formula 1 as an insider journalist, I have built trusted connections across the paddock, from race engineers and mechanics to senior team figures. At The Judge 13, I and a handful of trusted colleagues share exclusive Formula 1 news, expert analysis and behind-the-scenes stories you will not find in mainstream motorsport media.

16 thoughts on “Media: Hamilton quits”

  1. 2021 was not a strategic error if normal safety car RULES had been followed, pitting would not be the right thing to do.
    Thought you might know this but clearly you know very little.

    Reply
    • Couldn’t agree more. Many people pick out the bits of the 2021 last race saga to suit the way they want readers to see it.
      Truth was chronologically as the Safety Car was called Lewis had just passed the pit entrance where as Max, being 13 seconds behind arrived there just at the correct time time. If Lewis had pitted the next time round he would have ended up behind Max. Some people report this as fantastic strategy by RBR and poor strategy by Mercedes.
      Masi initially said cars would not be allowed to unlap themselves. This left Lewis I front with several cars between him and Max. Mercedes thought that the race would finish behind the safety car and that even if they had a one lap shootout Max would struggle to get past these slower cars and Lewis would still win.
      The rest is history as Masi removed the cars between Lewis and Max but did not let all the other lapped cars behind Max unlap themselves. Had all cars been allowed to unlap that last lap shootout would not have been possible. The other thing to remember is that Masi didn’t allow those cars who were allowed to unlap themselves time to join the back of the pack. Once again had Masi waited for that the race would have finished behind the safety car. Although Masi was sacked over his failure to uphold the rules it was not all down to him. Masi was trying to get the track cleared so they could have at least a one lap shootout. It was RBR principles who placed the idea of a one lap shootout in Masis’ head. They also suggested that Masi should get rid of those lapped cars between Lewis and Max. They even said there was no need to allow those lapped cars to join the back of the pack.
      All together it was a final race that was orchestrated by RBR principles and a tinned by an overloaded ra e director. Once again RBR proving that they are prepared to twist the rules and cheat at any cost.

      Reply
    • That’s the point, normal Safty Car rules were not followed by Michael Massi, the race controller.
      He changed the rules when put under pressure by Horner.
      A few weeks later he was sacked by F1 for doing so.

      Reply
  2. what a biast read.
    don’t like Hamilton much.
    you could say the same about Schumacher, vettel,verstappen when they won there world titles.
    they was in a better car, now mclaren is the better one, that’s f1, evolution.
    Hamilton was robbed at Abu dubai, all cars have to unlap themselves, that didn’t happen so massi could make it a last lap for the title, giving verstappen a massive advantage.
    if it had finished under safety car as it should have Hamilton would have been 8 times world champ, he has been the best f1 driver ever and is the greatest, it’s simple.
    going on verstappen, ìf I was one of the drivers ,I wouldn’t ĺet him bully me, I’d let him crash into me rather than let him intimidate drivers into avoiding a crash because he’s reckless.
    he’s spat his dummy out because he’s not winning anymore, boo hoo.
    grow up you petulant little boy 😉

    Reply
    • In previous years Lewis always blamed the Stewards. As you stated always having tantrums in his pram through this. Spitting out his dummy if he gets penalised by them. Since the Verstappen incident he hasn’t won a race since. Switched to Ferrari hasn’t improved things. Now getting to old slowing down except for China sprint race never made the podium.

      Reply
  3. Maybe follow your own advice, since you’re still crying over something that happened for years ago. It happened.
    And we know everyone needs a bad guy to point at, so of course you’ll pick someone who dares to take risks and has the taken my to go far. If Max had been middling, you wouldn’t have given two cents, but you just can’t stand that he is a good driver.

    No, the world hates that he’s not British, yet that he’s got the fire that makes for a good driver.
    Why should there be someone to hate? I have been involved in watching since 1994, when I was nothing more than a 4 year old enjoying the sight of colourful cars going around the track while my family eagerly watched.

    Reply
  4. Oh, and Abu Dhabi 2021? If Hamilton had pitted and gotten new soft tyres while being let past the back markers, he would’ve won the race, since he had the faster car.

    And ofc we only whine because it was Max winning, I doubt you’d do so if it was in favor of Lewis even though you’ll now forever deny that. I’m tired of people saying he doesn’t deserve the title or that he only won 3 because 2021 was “illegitimate”. Get over it. Read back what Lewis had to say about it and move on. They did.

    Now my little rant is over. Time for Piastri’s era, at least he’s almost English so that should make it an easier pill to swallow.

    Reply
    • Hamilton has won 7 World titles (8 if you include 2021, as I do), and each time he beat a teammate with the same machinery.

      Reply
  5. Best drivers were those who drove cars devoid of
    all technology and where pure skill was tested.
    It would be fun to put today’s drivers in those
    cars and see who comes out tops.My money on
    Verstappen

    Reply
  6. I couldn’t agree more, Hamilton is seen as some kind of super driver,but, when you have the best car and couldn’t care less (as Nico proved) then it’s not as difficult. I think the content and comments are correct and say it all

    Reply
  7. Desperate stuff about British media & Verstappen.
    Everyone who follows F1 knows about him & his kamikaze driving style.
    Did you not see the spectators wearing T-shirt s with a picture of Verstappen’s face and written below: “I turn now, good luck everyone else”.
    And they weren’t British spectators.
    It’s no coincidence that virtually every time there’s an incident like this, Verstappen is involved.

    Reply
  8. This is one of the worst F1 articles I’ve ever read. Nothing here is actually based on any sort of fact or objectivity.

    Reply
  9. What a terribly biased article haha. Normal safety car rules were not followed in Abu Dhabi ‘21. Max purposely caused the collision with George. Give your head a wobble and take the orange tinted glasses off.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from TJ13

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading