In a significant move, F1 TV, the streaming service dedicated to Formula 1, has announced the withdrawal of its past race recaps and archives from its French catalogue. This decision is in response to France’s strict anti-smoking legislation, which affects the advertising of tobacco products.
The withdrawal will take effect on 11 July 2024 and will affect a wide range of content, much to the disappointment of French subscribers. French subscribers received an unexpected email from F1 TV late on Monday afternoon informing them of the impending changes. The message detailed the removal of replays, recaps and both pre- and post-race programmes for the entire 2024 season. It also announced the deletion of archives of races from previous seasons and all programmes and documentaries, including popular series such as ‘Tech Talks’, ‘Jolyon Palmer’s Analysis’ and ‘F1 Icons’.
Compliance with French law
The primary reason for this comprehensive removal is to ensure compliance with French anti-smoking legislation, in particular Article L3511-3 of the French Public Health Code.
This law strictly prohibits any direct or indirect propaganda or advertising for tobacco products, including any form of free distribution. Formula 1 has cited these regulations as the driving force behind its decision to avoid any legal repercussions associated with the display of tobacco advertising in archived footage.
Live coverage remains unaffected
Despite these changes, live broadcasts of Formula 1 events will continue. French law allows the broadcasting of motorsport events held in countries where tobacco advertising is legal. As a result, F1 TV, in partnership with Canal+, will continue to offer live coverage of practice sessions, qualifying and races for F1, F2, F3 and the F1 Academy.
This will ensure that fans can continue to enjoy live events, albeit with a reduced offer of archived content.
Mercedes boss hopes “it will really f**k them up”
Subscription price adjustments
In light of the reduced content offering, F1 TV has adjusted its subscription prices. Annual subscriptions will be reduced from €64.99 to €49.99, while monthly subscriptions will be reduced from €7.99 to €5.99.
This reduction aims to reflect the reduced value of the service due to the withdrawal of content and to maintain subscriber satisfaction in the midst of the changes.
The Canal+ precedent
F1 TV’s move is not without precedent. In February 2023, Canal+, which has held the rights to broadcast the Formula 1 World Championship in France since 2013, was condemned for failing to blur tobacco branding in its broadcasts. In particular, archive footage of the 1991 Brazilian Grand Prix showed prominent ‘Marlboro’ logos on Ayrton Senna’s car, leading to legal problems for the broadcaster.
This incident highlights the strict enforcement of anti-smoking laws in France and the potential consequences for broadcasters.
Russell 8-1 to Hamilton: The secret of his success revealed
The wider implications for F1 TV
F1 TV’s decision to withdraw a significant portion of its content is a strategic move to navigate the complex landscape of French advertising laws and ensure that they are not fined or even banned from broadcasting the sport.
The streaming service was already facing challenges in the French market, particularly with strong competition from Canal+, which has exclusive rights to Formula 1 broadcasts. In addition, F1 TV suspended new subscriptions in December, indicating that it is continuing to adjust its business model.
Compliance with Article L3511-3
Article L3511-3 of the French Public Health Code is central to understanding the reasons for F1 TV’s content removal. This law explicitly prohibits any form of direct or indirect propaganda or advertising for tobacco products. The inclusion of tobacco branding in archived race footage and documentaries could be interpreted as indirect advertising, in breach of French law.
By removing such content, F1 TV aims to eliminate any potential legal risk and ensure full compliance with national regulations.
The McLaren case and tobacco sponsorship
The issue of tobacco advertising is particularly relevant in the context of Formula 1, where several teams have historic and ongoing sponsorships with tobacco companies. For example, McLaren’s association with British American Tobacco (BAT) includes the prominent display of Vuse and Velo brand logos on its cars.
Vuse is an electronic cigarette brand, while Velo sells nicotine pouches. Such sponsorships complicate the compliance landscape as archived footage often features these logos, requiring strict measures to avoid legal pitfalls.
F1 TV’s withdrawal of summaries and archives in France is a significant development for the streaming service and its subscribers. Driven by the need to comply with French anti-smoking legislation, the decision reflects the complex interplay between sports broadcasting and advertising regulations.
While live broadcasts will continue, the loss of extensive archive content is a notable change for French fans. As F1 TV adjusts its offering and subscription prices, the wider implications of this move underline the challenges faced by international broadcasters in complying with different regulatory environments.
The question now is, how many other countries will follow suit?
McLaren blow Norris GP win with poor safety car decision
Background to tobacco sponsorship
Background to Tobacco sponsorship in Formula One dates back to the late 1960s and early 1970s, a time when cigarette advertising was widespread in various sports. The pioneering team was Lotus, who signed a landmark deal with Imperial Tobacco in 1968.
The deal saw the Lotus 49 car emblazoned with the red, white and gold colours of the Gold Leaf cigarette brand. This partnership marked the beginning of a new era in motorsport, as other teams quickly followed suit, recognising the lucrative potential of such sponsorship deals.
Alpine confirms Schumacher talks
The golden era
The 1970s and 1980s saw the golden age of tobacco sponsorship in Formula One. The sport became synonymous with iconic cigarette brands, and teams secured substantial financial backing from the tobacco industry.
One of the most famous partnerships was between Marlboro and McLaren, which began in 1974. Marlboro’s distinctive red and white livery became an integral part of McLaren’s cars, contributing to their global recognition. Similarly, the partnership between Camel and Lotus, and later Camel and Benetton, brought significant financial resources to the teams.
During this period, tobacco money helped to fuel the technological advances and competitive edge of many teams. Financial support from cigarette companies enabled teams to invest in research and development, which ultimately contributed to the spectacle and excitement of the sport.
Dominos fall in the driver market as BIG contract announcement made
Growing controversy and regulation
In the late 1980s and early 1990s, growing awareness of the health risks associated with smoking began to cast a shadow over tobacco sponsorship in sport. Public health campaigns and increased government scrutiny led to the introduction of regulations restricting tobacco advertising.
In 1991, the European Union began the process of trying to ban tobacco advertising on television, which began to affect the broadcasting of Formula One races in Europe.
Despite these growing concerns, the financial appeal of tobacco sponsorship remained strong. The 1990s saw some of the most visible and high-profile tobacco partnerships. Marlboro continued its dominant presence with Ferrari, a relationship that began in 1997 and has become one of the longest and most iconic in the sport. Other notable sponsorships included Rothmans with Williams and West with McLaren.
Marko: “Perez has mental issues”
The millennium and the exit
The early 2000s marked the beginning of the end for tobacco sponsorship in Formula One. Increasing legislative pressure around the world forced the sport to adapt. In 2001, the European Union set a deadline of 2005 for a total ban on tobacco advertising in sport.
Formula 1, with its global reach, had to comply with different national regulations, making it increasingly difficult to maintain these sponsorships.
By 2006, the last year before the comprehensive EU ban took effect, most teams had already phased out their tobacco sponsors. Ferrari’s association with Marlboro continued in a more subtle form, with the team continuing to receive financial support without overt branding on the cars.
This association continues to this day, the most recent campaign being the 2018 Mission Winnow advertising for Ferrari which has been displayed on and off their F1 cars for several years.
READ MORE: The actual reason behind Perez re-sign
MORE F1 NEWS: Dominos fall in the driver market as BIG contract confirmed in Canada
As the news embargo ended at 15:30 local time in Canada, Christian Horner confirmed Yuki Tsunoda will remain with the RB team for the next two years. The Japanese driver was rumoured to be living the team the end of last season, as insiders close to the team revealed Christian Horner wanted him out and Liam Lawson in.
Tsunoda’s team mate Daniel Ricciardo, who was brought back by Horner to beef up the Red Bull junior squad following his exit from McLaren, was expected to eventually replace Sergio Perez who at the time was suffering a poor run of…READ MORE ON THIS STORY
The Judge, a nom de plume of an experienced F1 journalist and site founder with long-standing sources across the paddock. With over 30 years of experience in Formula 1 as an insider journalist, I have built trusted connections across the paddock, from race engineers and mechanics to senior team figures. At The Judge 13, I and a handful of trusted colleagues share exclusive Formula 1 news, expert analysis and behind-the-scenes stories you will not find in mainstream motorsport media.
F1 TV needs to establish a server in a country that allows tobacco advertising, then widely publicise that you can access the server from any VPN. Problem solved!
The ban on tobacco advertising is global, isn’t it?