FIA’s race leader Charlie Whiting had a heated driver meeting today, in Bahrein. And with him Ferrari’s Sebastian Vettel. Vettel had to listen to a lot of criticism about his starting position on the grid of Shanghai.
Sebastian Vettel put his Ferrari, at the start of the Chinese Grand Prix, approximatly one meter outside his start box. According to him because he suspected better grip there. Vettel did not think he did anything wrong since Daniel Ricciardo had done the same during the start of the Japanese Grand Prix of 2016, and he was not punished for it.
But he forgot that back then there was a roast of Ricciardo at the next driver’s briefing in Austin. Once again, same as back then, Whiting read the regulations of the start to the drivers today. These are: The driver must make every effort to go into his start position. But what exactly is a starting position? There is nowhere written how far left or right you can place your car. “Theoretically one stands in his start box, as soon as only one wheel is placed in it” says Force India-Teammanager Andy Stevenson. “This is not, of course, the way they meant the rule when they crafted it.”
At the driver’s meeting in Bahrain, Sebastian Vettel had to listen to his fellow drivers complaints for 22 minutes. Lewis Hamilton, Fernando Alonso and Felipe Massa where the ones who had the most critique on the Ferrari driver. They wanted to know from Charlie Whiting why the action was unpunished last sunday, and whether everyone would be able to put his car where they wanted, in the future.
The answer to the second question was a firm ‘No’. The FIA expects all drivers to place their cars as precisely as possible into the start box. Anyone who is as far off as Vettel in Shanghai, will be a case for the stewards. And they won’t always come to the same mild decision as in China.
During todays meeting it also surfaced that Whiting has admitted that Vettel escaped a pit lane start. Whiting wanted to cancel the start, because of his start position. That would have meant for Vettel that he had to start the race in the pit lane, indisputably! But according to Whiting he didn’t went through with it because he felt that this punishment would not fit the crime. So he referred the case to the stewards. Of course not everyone at the meeting felt the same way. “Either he did something wrong or he didn’t. Half wrong is not a possibility. So he should have felt the consequences.” replied Renault’s Alan Permane.
Belgian 🇧🇪 motorsport writer associated with thejudge13.com and drivetribe.com
“Theoretically one stands in his start box, as soon as only one wheel is placed in it” says Force India-Teammanager Andy Stevenson. “This is not, of course, the way they meant the rule when they crafted it.”
The fact the rule wasn’t crafted / written properly isn’t Vettel’s problem. The “that’s not what we meant” argument by the FIA doesn’t hold up now as it didn’t with Riccardo.
Exactly.
36.9 When the cars come back to the grid at the end of the formation lap (or laps, see Article 39.16), they will stop within their respective grid positions, keeping their engines running.
Everybody knows, including Vettel, what “stopping within their respective grid positions” means. Imagine that all drivers on the grid would “place one wheel in their start box” … complete chaos … kinda like it though.
It’s not the first time we’ve seen alt. positioning in the start box. It’s just the most extreme one.
This is classic FIA motus operandi rules are left to different interpretation by different people. If the FIA want rules to be followed then they have to write them in detail not insert loopholes such as “make every effort.” State every driver must be in his start box “within the lines on the grid” or face penalty.
Agreed.
They could have aborted the start and made them go around again … but they didn’t.
If they’d done that, vettel should have started from the pitlane. Any driver who interrupts the starting procedure is forced to do that. And that is something Charlie found to harhs as a punishment for Vettel.
Then that’s what should’ve happened based on 2016 and they actually written the rules properly
Why?
It didn’t apply to Riciardo.
The FIA employ lawyers and intelligent people, and they pay them a lot to do their jobs. Start positioningredients shouldn’t be up for debate. A simple “with both front wheels” would not leave it open to interpretation.
I agree. There are easy ways to write the rule, bulletproof.
Another terribly written article.
Thank you. I aim to please.
Yeah, those rule makers write terrible articles!
What was so bad!
OK,a word here or there wasn’t caught by proof reading, but not so bad as to ruin the flow.
Bruznic doesn’t get paid for his efforts.
Nor was this proofread. I put it up near 12 pm(which is late if you get up at 5am) in order to share it with my f1 loving readers. I geuss Nik isnt one of them 😂
love to see a start where everybody has one foot in the grid box. please can’t we try it once???
I’ve often wondered about this, Lewis had a habit of starting with his car at a very odd angle when racing Rosberg, that was never questioned. Personally I want to see cars straight in the grid slots and not misaligned like Vettel/Ric.
The angle is allowed, iirc. Since it’s still inbetween the lines.